The addition of very light loads into the routine testing of the bench press increases the reliability of the force-velocity relationship.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine whether the addition of very light loads for modeling the force-velocity (F-V) relationship during the bench press (BP) exercise can confirm its experimental linearity as well as to increase the reliability and concurrent validity of the F-V relationship parameters (maximum force ( F ₀ ), maximum velocity ( V ₀ ), F-V slope, and maximum power ( P _max )).
Method: The F-V relationship of 19 healthy men were determined using three different methods: (I) 6-loads free method: six loads performed during the traditional free-weight BP exercise (≈ 1-8-29-39-49-59 kg), (II) 4-loads free method: four loads performed during the traditional free-weight BP exercise (≈ 29-39-49-59 kg), and (III) 4-loads Smith method: four loads performed during the ballistic bench press throw exercise in a Smith machine (≈ 29-39-49-59 kg).
Results: The linearity of the F-V relationship was very high and comparable for the three F-V methods ( p = 0.204; median Pearson's correlation coefficient ( r ) = 0.99). The three methods were ranked from the most to the least reliable as follows: 6-loads free (coefficient of variation (CV) range = 3.6-6.7%) > 4-loads Smith (CV range = 4.6-12.4%) > 4-loads free (CV range = 3.8-14.5%). The higher reliability of the 6-loads free method was especially pronounced for F-V slope (CV _ratio ≥ 1.85) and V ₀ (CV _ratio ≥ 1.49) parameters, while the lowest difference in reliability was observed for F ₀ (CV _ratio ≤ 1.27). The 6-loads free and 4-loads free methods showed a very high concurrent validity respect to the 4-loads Smith method for F ₀ and P _max ( r ≥ 0.89), a moderate validity for the F-V slope ( r = 0.66-0.82), and a low validity for V ₀ ( r ≤ 0.37).
Discussion: The routine testing of the F-V relationship of upper-body muscles through the BP exercise should include trials with very light loading conditions to enhance the reliability of the F-V relationship.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.