Back to Search Start Over

Sparing the surgical area with stereotactic body radiotherapy for combined treatment of spinal metastases: a treatment planning study.

Authors :
Versteeg AL
Hes J
van der Velden JM
Eppinga W
Kasperts N
Verkooijen HM
van Vulpen M
Oner FC
Seravalli E
Verlaan JJ
Source :
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) [Acta Oncol] 2019 Feb; Vol. 58 (2), pp. 251-256. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Decreasing the radiation dose in the surgical area is important to lower the risk of wound complications when surgery and radiotherapy are combined for the treatment of spinal metastases. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the surgical area for spinal metastases between single fraction external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and single fraction SBRT with active sparing (SBRT-AS) of the posterior surgical area.<br />Methods: Radiotherapy treatment plans for EBRT, SBRT and SBRT-AS of the posterior surgical area were created for 13 patients with spinal metastases. A single fraction of 8Gy was prescribed to the spinal metastasis in the EBRT plan. For the SBRT treatment plans, a single fraction of 18Gy was prescribed to the metastasis and 8Gy to the rest of the vertebral body. For the SBRT plan with active sparing the dose in the designated surgical area was minimized without compromising the dose to the organs at risk.<br />Results: The median dose in the surgical area was 2.6Gy (1.6-5.3Gy) in the SBRT plan with active sparing of the surgical area compared to a median dose of 3.7Gy (1.6-6.3Gy) in the SBRT plan without sparing and 6.5Gy (3.5-9.1Gy) in the EBRT plans (pā€‰<ā€‰.001). The radiation doses to the spinal metastases and organs at risk were not significantly different between the SBRT plan with and without sparing the surgical area.<br />Conclusions: The radiation dose to the surgical area is significantly decreased with the use of SBRT compared to EBRT. Active sparing of the surgical area further decreased the mean radiation dose in the surgical area without compromising the dose to the spinal metastasis and the organs at risk.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1651-226X
Volume :
58
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30513233
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1539240