Back to Search Start Over

Maintenance rituximab or observation after frontline treatment with bendamustine-rituximab for follicular lymphoma.

Authors :
Hill BT
Nastoupil L
Winter AM
Becnel MR
Cerhan JR
Habermann TM
Link BK
Maurer MJ
Fakhri B
Reddy P
Smith SD
Mukhija D
Jagadeesh D
Desai A
Alderuccio JP
Lossos IS
Mehra P
Portell CA
Goldman ML
Calzada O
Cohen JB
Hussain MJ
Ghosh N
Caimi P
Tiutan T
Martin P
Kodali A
Evens AM
Kahl BS
Source :
British journal of haematology [Br J Haematol] 2019 Feb; Vol. 184 (4), pp. 524-535. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 21.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Bendamustine (B) with rituximab (R) is a standard frontline treatment for medically fit follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. The safety and efficacy of maintenance rituximab (MR) after BR induction has not been formally compared to observation for FL, resulting in disparate practice patterns. Prospective trials have shown benefit of MR after R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone), yet recent data from the GALLIUM study comparing outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy with R or obinutuzumab (G) showed higher than anticipated fatal adverse events with BR/BG. In order to assess the efficacy and tolerability of MR after BR, we retrospectively collected data on 640 newly diagnosed patients treated with FL. We found that patients who achieved partial remission (PR) after ≥4 cycles of BR had improved duration of response (DOR) with MR vs. no maintenance, whereas those in complete remission did not. These findings were confirmed in a validation cohort. In the entire study population, the known fatal adverse event rate after BR was 2·5% and did not significantly differ in those receiving MR versus no maintenance. [Correction added on 14 January 2019, after online publication: The preceding sentence has been corrected in this current version.] Within the limitations inherent to retrospective analysis, these data suggest that FL patients with a PR to BR experience prolongation of remission with MR with an acceptable safety profile.<br /> (© 2018 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2141
Volume :
184
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
British journal of haematology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30575016
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15720