Widening Time Disparities between Two Paradigms: Tama-REgistry of Acute Endovascular Thrombectomy.

Background: The Tama-REgistry of Acute endovascular Thrombectomy (TREAT) is a multicenter registry of endovascular thrombectomy in the Tama area of Tokyo. The objective of this study was to confirm the real-world status of 2 paradigms of transportation.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from TREAT. Patients were divided into 2 groups and 2 periods: directly admitted to an endovascular thrombectomy-capable center (ECC; group D)/secondary transfer from a non-ECC (group S), and the first period/the second period. Transfer distance, workflow metrics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
Results: A total of 326 patients, including 264 in group D and 62 in group S, were analyzed. The median distance from the onset-to-ECC was 3.62km for group D and 7.87km for group S (P < .001). The median onset-to-needle (OTN) time was longer for group S (168 minutes) than group D (138 minutes; P = .006). The median onset-to-reperfusion (OTR) time was significantly shorter for group D (247 minutes) than for group S (304 minutes; P = .029). With respect to the 2 periods, there was no significant difference in onset-to-puncture time between the 2 groups in the first period (207 minutes versus 243.5 minutes, respectively, P = .50), while there was one in the second period (164 minutes versus 246.5 minutes, respectively, P = .02).
Conclusions: This region-wide registry study showed longer OTN and OTR times, with no improvement of the time course over time in patients transported via non-ECCs. These results should be used to create a regional medical policy for the management of acute ischemic stroke.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)