Back to Search Start Over

Renal Transplant and Its Outcomes: Single-Center Experience From India.

Authors :
Gupta KL
Pattanashetti N
Ramachandran R
Nada R
Aggarwal R
Sharma A
Source :
Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation [Exp Clin Transplant] 2019 Jan; Vol. 17 (Suppl 1), pp. 78-82.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives: Improvements in early graft survival and long-term graft function have made kidney transplant a more cost-effective alternative to dialysis. We aimed to assess renal transplant outcomes over a 9-month follow-up of recipients in a cost-limited setting (a tertiary care center in India).<br />Materials and Methods: Included patients in this prospective observational study were those who underwent renal transplant from July 2016 to February 2017 (8 months) and followed for 9 months.<br />Results: Of 122 included patients, 20 (16.4%) were women and 102 (83.6%) were men (mean age 35.61 ± 10.64 y), with 92 (75.4%) from a lower socioeconomic status. Kidneys were from first-degree relatives for 52 patients (42.6%), from spousal donors for 34 (27.9%), from deceased donors for 24 (19.7%), and from second/third degree relative donors for 12 (9.8%). All patients underwent only complementdependent cytotoxicity crossmatch due to financial constraints. Fifty patients (41%) had history of packed red blood cell transfusion. Induction was thymoglobulin in 60 patients (49.2%), basiliximab in 8 (6.6%), and no induction in 54 (44.3%). Forty patients (30.1%) underwent biopsy for graft dysfunction, and 32 (26.2%) had graft rejection: 18 (14.8%) with antibodymediated rejection, 5 (4.1%) with T-cell-mediated rejection, and 9 (7.4%) with both. Opportunistic infections were shown in 24.5% of patients, including primarily cytomegalovirus (10.7%), tuberculosis (5.7%), and aspergillosis (3.3%). Twenty-nine patients (24%) had new-onset diabetes posttransplant. At end of follow-up, 93 patients (76.2%) had normal graft function, 21 (17.2%) had chronic graft dysfunction, 3 (2.4%) had graft loss, and 5 (4.1%) died. History of blood transfusion (P = .001) predicted the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection, and induction used showed trend toward prediction (P = .083).<br />Conclusions: With high rejection rates, it would be prudent to include proper immunologic testing, even in cost-limited settings, pretransplant. The high infection and death rates are also concerning.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2146-8427
Volume :
17
Issue :
Suppl 1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30777528
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.MESOT2018.O14