Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of stone volume and its relationship with surgical outcomes in patients with staghorn calculi.

Authors :
Mulay A
Satav V
Kandari A
Sharma S
Mane D
Sabale V
Source :
Urology annals [Urol Ann] 2019 Jan-Mar; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 53-57.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Urolithiasis is one of the most common renal diseases with a significant burden on health-care system worldwide. Here, we evaluated the stone volume and its relationship with duration of operation, blood loss, and total stone clearance in patients with staghorn calculi.<br />Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study conducted from October 2015 to September 2017. Patients of either sex aged more than 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of staghorn calculus were eligible to participate in the study. Eligible patients were divided into three groups based on stone volume (assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography): Group 1 (≤5000 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ), Group 2 (>5000 to ≤20,000 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ), and Group 3 (>20,000 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ).<br />Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled in the study (Group 1, n = 9; Group 2, n = 66; and Group 3, n = 10). The mean age was 43.68 years, and 62.4% of patients were male. The mean operative time increased significantly from Groups 1-3, (31.67, 60.14, and 92.30 min, respectively). The mean pre- and postoperative hematocrit was highest in Group 3 (2.82%) ( P < 0.0001). Overall, the correlation between stone volume and operative time and difference in hematocrit showed a positive relationship. A total of five patients had residual calculus, and only four patients reported complications.<br />Conclusions: The results showed that patients with larger stone volume need more operative time and may have more blood loss.<br />Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0974-7796
Volume :
11
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urology annals
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30787571
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_65_18