Back to Search Start Over

7T CEST MRI: A potential imaging tool for the assessment of tumor grade and cell proliferation in breast cancer.

Authors :
Zaric O
Farr A
Poblador Rodriguez E
Mlynarik V
Bogner W
Gruber S
Asseryanis E
Singer CF
Trattnig S
Source :
Magnetic resonance imaging [Magn Reson Imaging] 2019 Jun; Vol. 59, pp. 77-87. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 14.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI in patients with breast carcinomas and possible correlations between magnetization transfer asymmetry (MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> ) values and histological features, such as tumor grade and the Ki-67 proliferation index.<br />Materials and Methods: Nine healthy subjects and 18 female patients were enrolled for this study. The imaging protocol for the patients consisted of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), CEST imaging, and T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI. CEST was performed using a 3D gradient echo (GRE) sequence, employing eight pre-saturation pulses of a duration of 50 ms and a duty cycle (DC) of 80%, with a mean amplitude of the saturation pulse train of 1 μT. The Z-spectrum was plotted and MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> values calculated for the frequency of the maximum of MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> curve, were correlated with the Ki-67 proliferation index and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Patient data were statistically assessed using the Games-Howell post-hoc and Pearson's correlation test.<br />Results: Different tumor types had asymmetry peaks at different positions of Z-spectrum. MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> (mean ± SD) (%) calculated for G1 (3.0 ± 0.3; range: 2.70-3.50) was not significantly lower than for G2 (4.50 ± 1.30; range: 3.20-6.50; p = 0.066). In contrast, the increase in MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> between G1 and G3 (6.40 ± 1.70; range: 4.80-9.80) lesions was significant (p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between G2 and G3 with regard to MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> (p = 0.089). There was a strong positive correlation between the MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> , and Ki-67 proliferation index (r = 0.890; p = 0.001), while there was a moderate negative correlation between MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> and ADC values (r = -0.506; p = 0.027).<br />Conclusions: Calculated MTR <subscript>asym</subscript> demonstrates a strong positive correlation with tumor proliferation and has the potential to become a valuable biomarker for breast tumor characterization.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5894
Volume :
59
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30880110
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.004