Back to Search Start Over

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose, Phase III, Non-Inferiority Study Comparing PrabotulinumtoxinA and OnabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients.

Authors :
Rzany BJ
Ascher B
Avelar RL
Bergdahl J
Bertucci V
Bodokh I
Carruthers JA
Cartier H
Delmar H
Denfeld R
Gross JE
Heckmann M
Hedén P
Hilton S
Inglefield C
Ogilvie P
Sattler G
Sebastian M
Solish N
Swift A
Trévidic P
Source :
Aesthetic surgery journal [Aesthet Surg J] 2020 Mar 23; Vol. 40 (4), pp. 413-429.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum.<br />Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxinA compared to onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo for the treatment of glabellar lines.<br />Methods: This was a 150-day, multicenter, double-blind, controlled, single-dose Phase III study. Adult patients (n = 540) with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown as assessed by the investigator on the validated 4-point Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), who also felt that their glabellar lines had an important psychological impact, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 5:5:1 to receive a single treatment (0.1 mL injected into each of 5 glabellar sites) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (n = 245), 20 U onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 246), or placebo (n = 49). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of responders (patients with a Glabellar Line Scale score of 0 or 1 at maximum frown by investigator assessment) on day 30.<br />Results: Responder rates for the primary efficacy endpoint were 87.2%, 82.8%, and 4.2% in the prabotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and placebo groups, respectively. The absolute difference between prabotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA groups was 4.4% (95% confidence interval [-1.9, 10.8]). Given that the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the difference was less than -10.0%, noninferiority of prabotulinumtoxinA vs onabotulinumtoxinA was concluded. Five patients (3 prabotulinumtoxinA, 1.2%; 1 onabotulinumtoxinA, 0.4%; 1 placebo, 2.0%) experienced serious adverse events, none of which were study drug related.<br />Conclusions: A single treatment of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA was safe and effective and noninferior to 20 U onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.<br /> (© 2019 The Aesthetic Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-330X
Volume :
40
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Aesthetic surgery journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30951166
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz110