Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Study of Diethylaminoethyl-Chitosan and Methylglycol-Chitosan as Potential Non-Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy.

Authors :
Raik SV
Andranovitš S
Petrova VA
Xu Y
Lam JK
Morris GA
Brodskaia AV
Casettari L
Kritchenkov AS
Skorik YA
Source :
Polymers [Polymers (Basel)] 2018 Apr 14; Vol. 10 (4). Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 14.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

In this paper, we compared the transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of methylglycol-chitosan (MG-CS) and diethylaminoethyl-chitosan (DEAE-CS <subscript>I</subscript> and DEAE-CS <subscript>II</subscript> with degrees of substitution of 1.2 and 0.57, respectively) to that of Lipofectamine (used as a reference transfection vector). MG-CS contains quaternary amines to improve DNA binding, whereas the DEAE-CS exhibits pH buffering capability that would ostensibly enhance transfection efficiency by promoting endosomal escape. Gel retardation assays showed that both DEAE-CS and MG-CS bound to DNA at a polysaccharide:DNA mass ratio of 2:1. In Calu-3 cells, the DNA transfection activity was significantly better with MG-CS than with DEAE-CS, and the efficiency improved with increasing polysaccharide:DNA ratios. By contrast, the efficiency of DEAE-CS <subscript>I</subscript> and DEAE-CS <subscript>II</subscript> was independent of the polysaccharide:DNA ratio. Conversely, in the transfection-recalcitrant JAWSII cells, both Lipofectamine and MG-CS showed significantly lower DNA transfection activity than in Calu-3 cells, whereas the efficiency of DEAE-CS <subscript>I</subscript> and DEAE-CS <subscript>II</subscript> was similar in both cell lines. The toxicity of DEAE-CS increased with increasing concentrations of the polymer and its degree of substitution, whereas MG-CS demonstrated negligible cytotoxicity, even at the highest concentration studied. Overall, MG-CS proved to be a more efficient and less toxic transfection agent when compared to DEAE-CS.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2073-4360
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Polymers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30966477
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10040442