Back to Search Start Over

User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen.

Authors :
Wang Y
Guo S
Zheng J
Wang QM
Zhang Y
Liang Z
Zhang L
Yang Y
Zhai H
Chen M
Wang Y
Li Y
Lyu X
Li X
Geng H
Zhu X
Yu F
Yuan J
Zhou J
Liu F
Luo H
Long J
Chen W
Li H
Fu G
Zhou C
Zhang J
Wang Y
Huo Y
Ke X
Zeng Y
Liu J
Xing H
Xiao H
Jiao R
Wu M
Tang Q
Luo X
Source :
Clinical rehabilitation [Clin Rehabil] 2019 Sep; Vol. 33 (9), pp. 1479-1491. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 13.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a novel pictorial-based Longshi Scale for evaluating a patient's disability by healthcare professionals and non-professionals.<br />Design: Prospective study.<br />Setting: Rehabilitation departments from a grade A, class 3 public hospital, a grade B, class 2 public hospital, and a private hospital and seven community rehabilitation centers.<br />Subjects: A total of 618 patients and 251 patients with functional disabilities were recruited in a two-phase study, respectively.<br />Main Measures: Outcome measure : pictorial scale of activities of daily living (ADLs, Longshi Scale). Reference measure : Barthel Index. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the validity of Longshi Scale against Barthel Index.<br />Results: In phase 1 study, from March 2016 to August 2016, the results demonstrated that the Longshi Scale was both reliable and valid (intraclass correlation coefficient based on two-way random effect (ICC <subscript>2,1</subscript> ) = 0.877-0.974 for intra-rater reliability; ICC <subscript>2,1</subscript> = 0.928-0.979; κ = 0.679-1.000 for inter-rater reliability; intraclass correlation coefficient based on one-way random effect (ICC <subscript>1,1</subscript> ) = 0.921-0.984 for test-retest reliability and Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.836-0.899). In the second phase, in March 2018, results further demonstrated that the Longshi Scale had good inter-rater and intra-rater reliability among healthcare professionals and non-professionals including therapists, interns, and personal care aids (ICC <subscript>1,1</subscript> = 0.822-0.882 on Day 1; ICC <subscript>1,1</subscript> = 0.842-0.899 on Day 7 for inter-rater reliability). In addition, the Longshi Scale decreased assessment time significantly, compared with the Barthel Index assessment ( P < 0.01).<br />Conclusion: The Longshi Scale could potentially provide an efficient way for healthcare professionals and non-professionals who may have minimal training to assess the ADLs of functionally disabled patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1477-0873
Volume :
33
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31081365
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519846543