Back to Search
Start Over
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.
- Source :
-
BMC cardiovascular disorders [BMC Cardiovasc Disord] 2019 May 14; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 108. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 14. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with poorer outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). For high-risk patients with complex CAD, combined transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus off-pump/minimally-invasive coronary artery bypass (OPCAB/MIDCAB) has been proposed.<br />Methods: A prospective registry analysis was performed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR+OP/MIDCAB with those undergoing TAVR plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical AVR plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2008 and 2015 at a single site in Germany.<br />Results: 464 patients underwent SAVR+CABG, 50 underwent TAVR+OP/MIDCAB, and 112 underwent TAVR+PCI. The mean ages (p < 0.001) and logistic EuroSCOREs (p < 0.001) were similarly higher in TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and TAVR+PCI patients compared to SAVR+CABG patients. Prior cardiac surgery was more common in TAVR+PCI than in TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and SAVR+CABG patients (p < 0.001). Procedural times were shortest (p < 0.001), creatine kinase (muscle brain) levels least elevated (p < 0.001), pericardial tamponade least common (p = 0.027), and length of hospital stay shortest (p = 0.011) in TAVR+PCI, followed by TAVR+OP/MIDCAB and SAVR+CABG patients. In-hospital mortality was highest for TAVR+OP/MIDCAB patients (18.0%) with comparable rates for TAVR+PCI and SAVR+CABG groups (9.0 and 6.9%; p = 0.009). Mortality by 12 months was more probable after TAVR+OP/MIDCAB (HR: 2.17, p = 0.002) and TAVR/PCI (HR: 1.63, p = 0.010) than after SAVR+CABG, with the same true of rehospitalisation (HR: 2.39, p = 0.003 and HR: 1.63, p = 0.033).<br />Conclusions: TAVR+OP/MIDCAB patients share many characteristics with TAVR+PCI patients, with only slightly poorer long-term outcomes. In patients ineligible for SAVR+CABG and TAVR+PCI, hybrid interventions are reasonable second-line options.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis complications
Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality
Biomarkers blood
Cardiac Tamponade etiology
Clinical Decision-Making
Coronary Artery Disease complications
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Creatine Kinase, MB Form blood
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Operative Time
Patient Selection
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Valve surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump adverse effects
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump mortality
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement mortality
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1471-2261
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC cardiovascular disorders
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31088373
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2