Back to Search Start Over

Low-level laser therapy dosimetry most used for oral mucositis due to radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Peralta-Mamani M
da Silva BM
da Silva Pinto AC
Rubira-Bullen IRF
Honório HM
Rubira CMF
da Silva Santos PS
Source :
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology [Crit Rev Oncol Hematol] 2019 Jun; Vol. 138, pp. 14-23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 31.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Dosimetry for low-level laser therapy (LLLT) depends on several parameters, such as target tissue type, lesion type and laser equipment used. This study aimed to determine the most used LLLT dosimetry for the treatment and prevention of oral mucositis (OM) resulting from radiation therapy (RT) in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP). This research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines using the PICO framework. After extensively searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, BVS and Cochrane Library databases, we found 130 records and selected 7 studies, involving 363 HNCP with an average age of 60.6 years who received RT. Briefly, sites affected by tumors were the following: oral cavity (170), oropharynx (91), throat (42), larynx (32), nasopharynx (11), hypopharynx (9), and in 8 cases, sites were not reported. These studies used several classifications for OM (RTOG/EORTC, WHO, NCI-CTC) and pain (NRS, VAS and modified VAS). These various researchers performed the LLLT punctual application of different forms using several protocols making analysis difficult. However, LLLT was effective regardless of the parameters used (632.8 nm to 685 nm, 1.8 J/cm <superscript>2</superscript> to 3.0 J/cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 10 mW to 60 Mw, 0.8 J to 3.0 J). The meta-analysis showed a better results with preventive LLLT 660 nm, 3.8 J/cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 15 mW; 0.15 J compared to preventive LLLT 660 nm, 1.3 J/cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 5 mW; 0.05 J (OMS: p = 0.03; NCI-CTC: p = 0.027). We conclude that there is, as of yet, no evidence of better laser dosimetry being more effective. Thus, randomized clinical trials to determine which doses of LLLT are most appropriate for treating and preventing OM due to RT are lacking and should be further investigated.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0461
Volume :
138
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31092370
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.009