Back to Search Start Over

Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Endothelial Function and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Boff W
da Silva AM
Farinha JB
Rodrigues-Krause J
Reischak-Oliveira A
Tschiedel B
Puñales M
Bertoluci MC
Source :
Frontiers in physiology [Front Physiol] 2019 Apr 24; Vol. 10, pp. 450. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 24 (Print Publication: 2019).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT) on endothelial function, oxidative stress and clinical fitness in patients with type 1 diabetes. Thirty-six type 1 diabetic patients (mean age 23.5 ± 6 years) were randomized into 3 groups: HIIT, MCT, and a non-exercising group (CON). Exercise was performed in a stationary cycle ergometers during 40 min, 3 times/week, for 8 weeks at 50-85% maximal heart rate (HR <subscript>max</subscript> ) in HIIT and 50% HR <subscript>max</subscript> in MCT. Endothelial function was measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) [endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDVD)], and smooth-muscle function by nitroglycerin-mediated dilation [endothelium-independent vasodilation (EIVD)]. Peak oxygen consumption (VO <subscript>2peak</subscript> ) and oxidative stress markers were determined before and after training. Endothelial dysfunction was defined as an increase < 8% in vascular diameter after cuff release. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03451201. Twenty-seven patients completed the 8-week protocol, 9 in each group (3 random dropouts per group). Mean baseline EDVD was similar in all groups. After training, mean absolute EDVD response improved from baseline in HIIT: + 5.5 ± 5.4%, ( P = 0.0059), but remained unchanged in MCT: 0.2 ± 4.1% ( P = 0.8593) and in CON: -2.6 ± 6.4% ( P = 0.2635). EDVD increase was greater in HIIT vs. MCT ( P = 0.0074) and CON ( P = 0.0042) (ANOVA with Bonferroni). Baseline VO <subscript>2peak</subscript> was similar in all groups ( P = 0.96). VO <subscript>2peak</subscript> increased 17.6% from baseline after HIIT ( P = 0.0001), but only 3% after MCT ( P = 0.055); no change was detected in CON ( P = 0.63). EIVD was unchanged in all groups ( P = 0.18). Glycemic control was similar in all groups. In patients with type 1 diabetes without microvascular complications, 8-week HIIT produced greater improvement in endothelial function and physical fitness than MCT at a similar glycemic control.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664-042X
Volume :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31110479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00450