Back to Search Start Over

A phase II randomized controlled study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin vs. gemcitabine and carboplatin for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (GOTIC003/intergroup study).

Authors :
Fujiwara H
Ushijima K
Nagao S
Takei Y
Shimada M
Takano M
Yoshino K
Kawano Y
Hirashima Y
Nagase S
Nishio S
Nishikawa T
Ito K
Shoji T
Kimura E
Takano T
Sugiyama T
Kigawa J
Fujiwara K
Suzuki M
Source :
International journal of clinical oncology [Int J Clin Oncol] 2019 Oct; Vol. 24 (10), pp. 1284-1291. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 24.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin (PLDC) with those of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.<br />Methods: Ovarian cancer patients with recurrence > 6 months after first-line platinum and taxane-based therapies were randomly assigned to PLDC [pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min on day 1] every 4 weeks or GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 4 mg/mL/min on day 1) every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and overall response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and dose administration were secondary endpoints.<br />Results: One-hundred patients (49 PLDC; 51 GC) were randomly assigned. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 9.2-15.0) for PLDC and 9.8 months (8.9-12.3) for GC [HR 0.69 (0.455-1.047)] with a difference of 2.2 months. The response rate was 57.1% (41.0-72.3) for PLDC and 56.4% (39.6-72.2) for GC. No obvious differences in toxicity (G3/4) were noted between arms. The median relative dose intensity of planned dose per week was 88.9% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 53.1% for gemcitabine (p < 0.0001).<br />Conclusions: PLDC and GC are both good treatment candidates for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients; however, the dose intensity was lower for GC than for PLDC. PLDC had a more favorable risk-benefit profile than that of GC for patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1437-7772
Volume :
24
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of clinical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31127479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01471-5