Back to Search
Start Over
Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes in patients treated with dual or triple antithrombotic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy [Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother] 2019 Oct 01; Vol. 5 (4), pp. 226-236. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Aims: The combination of oral anticoagulation with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a high bleeding risk. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with omission of aspirin is a promising option to reduce bleedings, but carries a yet unknown risk of ischaemic events. We therefore sought to systematically review and analyse randomized controlled trials investigating DAT vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) in patients with AF following PCI and/or acute coronary syndrome (ACS).<br />Methods and Results: We included four trials with overall 9317 patients (5039 DAT, 4278 TAT) in our analysis. Dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a significant reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.65; P = 0.0001], while the composite trial-defined ischaemic endpoint did not differ significantly between DAT and TAT (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79-1.22; P = 0.88). There was also no difference regarding the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.92-1.46; P = 0.21) or stent thrombosis (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69-2.26; P = 0.46). Absolute numbers for MI were 131/4278 (3.1%) with TAT and 182/5039 (3.6%) with DAT, and for stent thrombosis 32/4278 (0.75%) and 52/5039 (1%), respectively. A post hoc power calculation based on the size and event rate of this meta-analysis revealed 80% power to detect a 37% and 100% increase in MI and stent thrombosis, respectively.<br />Conclusion: Dual antithrombotic therapy significantly reduces bleedings compared with TAT and seems to have a similar effect in preventing ischaemic endpoints in AF patients post-PCI or ACS. Future investigations are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high risk of ischaemic outcomes.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnosis
Acute Coronary Syndrome epidemiology
Anticoagulants adverse effects
Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation epidemiology
Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis
Coronary Artery Disease epidemiology
Coronary Thrombosis epidemiology
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Fibrinolytic Agents adverse effects
Hemorrhage chemically induced
Humans
Male
Myocardial Infarction epidemiology
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stents
Treatment Outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy
Anticoagulants administration & dosage
Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Coronary Thrombosis prevention & control
Fibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage
Myocardial Infarction prevention & control
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors administration & dosage
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2055-6845
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31198930
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz021