Back to Search Start Over

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentine "American Shoulder and elbow surgeons, patient self-report section" questionnaire.

Authors :
Policastro PO
Pierobon A
Pérez J
Novoa GA
Calvo Delfino M
Sajfar ME
Salzberg S
Carmody C
Dorado JH
Raguzzi I
Soliño S
Pérez Calvo EC
Source :
Musculoskeletal science & practice [Musculoskelet Sci Pract] 2019 Oct; Vol. 43, pp. 37-44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 04.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire (ASES-p) has been translated into Spanish, but it has not been adapted to the Argentine population yet. Although Spain and Argentina speak the same language, linguistic differences between Spanish-speaking countries may affect the interpretation of the different items included in the questionnaire.<br />Objective: To conduct the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the self-report section of the ASES-p into Argentine Spanish for patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders, and to assess its psychometric properties.<br />Design: Study of diagnostic accuracy/assessment scale.<br />Method: The study was carried out in three consecutive phases: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation for its use in Argentina. In the third phase, we used the ASES-p, Short Form 36 (SF-36), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires, and the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale.<br />Results: One hundred three participants completed a set of questionnaires on two occasions and were included in the final analysis. The time taken to answer and score the questionnaire was 118 and 52 s, respectively. Neither a ceiling nor a floor effect was observed. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83. A significant correlation was found between the DASH, the GROC and various SF-36 subscales. There were strong indices of concurrent-cross validation, longitudinal validity, and construct validity. The ASES-p questionnaire showed a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) value of 7.88 points.<br />Conclusion: Some psychometric properties in reliability and validity were acceptable in the Argentine version of the ASES-p questionnaire.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2468-7812
Volume :
43
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Musculoskeletal science & practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31220777
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.05.010