Back to Search Start Over

Sex specific associations in genome wide association analysis of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors :
Laskar RS
Muller DC
Li P
Machiela MJ
Ye Y
Gaborieau V
Foll M
Hofmann JN
Colli L
Sampson JN
Wang Z
Bacq-Daian D
Boland A
Abedi-Ardekani B
Durand G
Le Calvez-Kelm F
Robinot N
Blanche H
Prokhortchouk E
Skryabin KG
Burdett L
Yeager M
Radojevic-Skodric S
Savic S
Foretova L
Holcatova I
Janout V
Mates D
Rascu S
Mukeria A
Zaridze D
Bencko V
Cybulski C
Fabianova E
Jinga V
Lissowska J
Lubinski J
Navratilova M
Rudnai P
Świątkowska B
Benhamou S
Cancel-Tassin G
Cussenot O
Trichopoulou A
Riboli E
Overvad K
Panico S
Ljungberg B
Sitaram RT
Giles GG
Milne RL
Severi G
Bruinsma F
Fletcher T
Koppova K
Larsson SC
Wolk A
Banks RE
Selby PJ
Easton DF
Pharoah P
Andreotti G
Beane Freeman LE
Koutros S
Albanes D
Männistö S
Weinstein S
Clark PE
Edwards TL
Lipworth L
Carol H
Freedman ML
Pomerantz MM
Cho E
Kraft P
Preston MA
Wilson KM
Michael Gaziano J
Sesso HD
Black A
Freedman ND
Huang WY
Anema JG
Kahnoski RJ
Lane BR
Noyes SL
Petillo D
Teh BT
Peters U
White E
Anderson GL
Johnson L
Luo J
Chow WH
Moore LE
Choueiri TK
Wood C
Johansson M
McKay JD
Brown KM
Rothman N
Lathrop MG
Deleuze JF
Wu X
Brennan P
Chanock SJ
Purdue MP
Scelo G
Source :
European journal of human genetics : EJHG [Eur J Hum Genet] 2019 Oct; Vol. 27 (10), pp. 1589-1598. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 23.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has an undisputed genetic component and a stable 2:1 male to female sex ratio in its incidence across populations, suggesting possible sexual dimorphism in its genetic susceptibility. We conducted the first sex-specific genome-wide association analysis of RCC for men (3227 cases, 4916 controls) and women (1992 cases, 3095 controls) of European ancestry from two RCC genome-wide scans and replicated the top findings using an additional series of men (2261 cases, 5852 controls) and women (1399 cases, 1575 controls) from two independent cohorts of European origin. Our study confirmed sex-specific associations for two known RCC risk loci at 14q24.2 (DPF3) and 2p21(EPAS1). We also identified two additional suggestive male-specific loci at 6q24.3 (SAMD5, male odds ratio (OR <subscript>male</subscript> ) = 0.83 [95% CI = 0.78-0.89], P <subscript>male</subscript>  = 1.71 × 10 <superscript>-8</superscript> compared with female odds ratio (OR <subscript>female</subscript> ) = 0.98 [95% CI = 0.90-1.07], P <subscript>female</subscript>  = 0.68) and 12q23.3 (intergenic, OR <subscript>male</subscript>  = 0.75 [95% CI = 0.68-0.83], P <subscript>male</subscript>  = 1.59 × 10 <superscript>-8</superscript> compared with OR <subscript>female</subscript>  = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.82-1.06], P <subscript>female</subscript>  = 0.21) that attained genome-wide significance in the joint meta-analysis. Herein, we provide evidence of sex-specific associations in RCC genetic susceptibility and advocate the necessity of larger genetic and genomic studies to unravel the endogenous causes of sex bias in sexually dimorphic traits and diseases like RCC.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5438
Volume :
27
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31231134
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0455-9