Back to Search Start Over

Visual assessment of movement quality in the single leg squat test: a review and meta-analysis of inter-rater and intrarater reliability.

Authors :
Ressman J
Grooten WJA
Rasmussen Barr E
Source :
BMJ open sport & exercise medicine [BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med] 2019 Jun 14; Vol. 5 (1), pp. e000541. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 14 (Print Publication: 2019).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Single leg squat (SLS) is a common tool used in clinical examination to set and evaluate rehabilitation goals, but also to assess lower extremity function in active people.<br />Objectives: To conduct a review and meta-analysis on the inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the SLS, including the lateral step-down (LSD) and forward step-down (FSD) tests.<br />Design: Review with meta-analysis.<br />Data Sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline (OVID) and Web of Science was searched up until December 2018.<br />Eligibility Criteria: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were methodological studies which assessed the inter-rater and/or intrarater reliability of the SLS, FSD and LSD through observation of movement quality.<br />Results: Thirty-one studies were included. The reliability varied largely between studies (inter-rater: kappa/intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.00-0.95; intrarater: kappa/ICC = 0.13-1.00), but most of the studies reached 'moderate' measures of agreement. The pooled results of ICC/kappa showed a 'moderate' agreement for inter-rater reliability, 0.58 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.65), and a 'substantial' agreement for intrarater reliability, 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.74). Subgroup analyses showed a higher pooled agreement for inter-rater reliability of ≤3-point rating scales while no difference was found for different numbers of segmental assessments.<br />Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the SLS test including the FSD and LSD tests can be suitable for clinical use regardless of number of observed segments and particularly with a ≤3-point rating scale. Since most of the included studies were affected with some form of methodological bias, our findings must be interpreted with caution.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018077822.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: Competing interest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2055-7647
Volume :
5
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open sport & exercise medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31275606
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000541