Back to Search Start Over

Survival outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants with EBV-positive or EBV-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, A CIBMTR study.

Authors :
Naik S
Riches M
Hari P
Kim S
Chen M
Bachier C
Shaughnessy P
Hill J
Ljungman P
Battiwalla M
Chhabra S
Daly A
Storek J
Ustun C
Diaz MA
Cerny J
Beitinjaneh A
Yared J
Brown V
Page K
Dahi PB
Ganguly S
Seo S
Chao N
Freytes CO
Saad A
Savani BN
Woo Ahn K
Boeckh M
Heslop HE
Lazarus HM
Auletta JJ
Kamble RT
Source :
Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society [Transpl Infect Dis] 2019 Oct; Vol. 21 (5), pp. e13145. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 31.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Although most PTLD is EBV-positive (EBV <superscript>pos</superscript> ), EBV-negative (EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> ) PTLD is reported, yet its incidence and clinical impact remain largely undefined. Furthermore, factors at the time of transplant impacting survival following PTLD are not well described.<br />Methods: Between 2002 and 2014, 432 cases of PTLD following alloHCT were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). After exclusions, 267 cases (EBV <superscript>pos </superscript> = 222, 83%; EBV <superscript>neg </superscript> = 45, 17%) were analyzed.<br />Results: Two hundred and eight patients (78%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. Incidence of PTLD was highest using umbilical cord donors (UCB, 1.60%) and lowest using matched related donors (MRD, 0.40%). Clinical features and histology did not significantly differ among EBV <superscript>pos</superscript> or EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> PTLD cases except that absolute lymphocyte count recovery was slower, and CMV reactivation was later in EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> PTLD [EBV <superscript>pos</superscript> 32 (5-95) days versus EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> 47 (10-70) days, P = .016]. There was no impact on survival by EBV status in multivariable analysis [EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94-2.15, P = .097].<br />Conclusions: There is no difference in survival outcomes for patients with EBV <superscript>pos</superscript> or EBV <superscript>neg</superscript> PTLD occurring following alloHCT and 1-year survival is poor. Features of conditioning and use of serotherapy remain important.<br /> (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1399-3062
Volume :
21
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31301099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13145