Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Flexible Family Visitation on Delirium Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The ICU Visits Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Rosa RG
Falavigna M
da Silva DB
Sganzerla D
Santos MMS
Kochhann R
de Moura RM
Eugênio CS
Haack TDSR
Barbosa MG
Robinson CC
Schneider D
de Oliveira DM
Jeffman RW
Cavalcanti AB
Machado FR
Azevedo LCP
Salluh JIF
Pellegrini JAS
Moraes RB
Foernges RB
Torelly AP
Ayres LO
Duarte PAD
Lovato WJ
Sampaio PHS
de Oliveira Júnior LC
Paranhos JLDR
Dantas ADS
de Brito PIPGG
Paulo EAP
Gallindo MAC
Pilau J
Valentim HM
Meira Teles JM
Nobre V
Birriel DC
Corrêa E Castro L
Specht AM
Medeiros GS
Tonietto TF
Mesquita EC
da Silva NB
Korte JE
Hammes LS
Giannini A
Bozza FA
Teixeira C
Source :
JAMA [JAMA] 2019 Jul 16; Vol. 322 (3), pp. 216-228.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Importance: The effects of intensive care unit (ICU) visiting hours remain uncertain.<br />Objective: To determine whether a flexible family visitation policy in the ICU reduces the incidence of delirium.<br />Design, Setting and Participants: Cluster-crossover randomized clinical trial involving patients, family members, and clinicians from 36 adult ICUs with restricted visiting hours (<4.5 hours per day) in Brazil. Participants were recruited from April 2017 to June 2018, with follow-up until July 2018.<br />Interventions: Flexible visitation (up to 12 hours per day) supported by family education (n = 837 patients, 652 family members, and 435 clinicians) or usual restricted visitation (median, 1.5 hours per day; n = 848 patients, 643 family members, and 391 clinicians). Nineteen ICUs started with flexible visitation, and 17 started with restricted visitation.<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was incidence of delirium during ICU stay, assessed using the CAM-ICU. Secondary outcomes included ICU-acquired infections for patients; symptoms of anxiety and depression assessed using the HADS (range, 0 [best] to 21 [worst]) for family members; and burnout for ICU staff (Maslach Burnout Inventory).<br />Results: Among 1685 patients, 1295 family members, and 826 clinicians enrolled, 1685 patients (100%) (mean age, 58.5 years; 47.2% women), 1060 family members (81.8%) (mean age, 45.2 years; 70.3% women), and 737 clinicians (89.2%) (mean age, 35.5 years; 72.9% women) completed the trial. The mean daily duration of visits was significantly higher with flexible visitation (4.8 vs 1.4 hours; adjusted difference, 3.4 hours [95% CI, 2.8 to 3.9]; P < .001). The incidence of delirium during ICU stay was not significantly different between flexible and restricted visitation (18.9% vs 20.1%; adjusted difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -6.1% to 2.7%]; P = .44). Among 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 did not differ significantly between flexible and restricted visitation, including ICU-acquired infections (3.7% vs 4.5%; adjusted difference, -0.8% [95% CI, -2.1% to 1.0%]; P = .38) and staff burnout (22.0% vs 24.8%; adjusted difference, -3.8% [95% CI, -4.8% to 12.5%]; P = .36). For family members, median anxiety (6.0 vs 7.0; adjusted difference, -1.6 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.9]; P < .001) and depression scores (4.0 vs 5.0; adjusted difference, -1.2 [95% CI, -2.0 to -0.4]; P = .003) were significantly better with flexible visitation.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients in the ICU, a flexible family visitation policy, vs standard restricted visiting hours, did not significantly reduce the incidence of delirium.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02932358.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1538-3598
Volume :
322
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31310297
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8766