Back to Search Start Over

Acute coronary syndrome registry enrolment status: differences in patient characteristics and outcomes and implications for registry data use (ANZACS-QI 36).

Authors :
Earle NJ
Kerr AJ
Legget M
Wu BP
Doughty RN
Poppe KK
Source :
European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes [Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes] 2021 Oct 28; Vol. 7 (6), pp. 542-547.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: Clinical registry-derived data are widely used to represent patient populations. In New Zealand (NZ), a national registry-the All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) registry-aims to include all patients undergoing coronary angiography; other acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are also registered but without complete capture. This study compares national hospitalization data of all first-time ACS admissions in NZ with patients in the ANZACS-QI registry, to investigate the use of clinical registry-derived data in research and in assessing clinical care.<br />Methods and Results: Patients admitted with first-time ACS in the NZ National Hospitalisation Dataset between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2016 were included. Clinical characteristics and time to 12-month clinical outcomes were compared between patients captured and not-captured in the registry. A total of 16 569 patients were admitted with first-time ACS, median age 69 years, 61% male; 60% (n = 9918) were enrolled in ANZACS-QI. Registry-captured patients were younger, more often male, and with a lower comorbidity burden than non-captured patients. Overall, 16% patients died within 12 months, 15% experienced a non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) readmission, and 28% either died or were readmitted. Patients not captured in the registry were more than twice as likely to have experienced death or a non-fatal CV readmission within 12 months as captured patients.<br />Conclusions: First-time ACS patients captured in the ANZACS-QI registry had very different clinical characteristics and outcomes than those not captured. Cardiovascular registry-derived data are dependent on registry design and may not be representative of the wider patient population; this must be considered when using registry-derived data.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2058-1742
Volume :
7
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31393578
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz046