Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of image quality of abdominopelvic CT in paediatric patients: low osmolar contrast media versus less iodine-containing iso-osmolar contrast media at different peak kilovoltages.

Authors :
Kim M
Hwang JY
Choo KS
Ryu H
Reid SNS
Kim YW
Kim TU
Kim JH
Source :
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2019 Nov; Vol. 74 (11), pp. 896.e9-896.e16. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 17.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) at different tube voltages on image quality for abdominal computed tomography (CT) in paediatric patients.<br />Materials and Methods: The low osmolar contrast media (LOCM) group and IOCM group consisted of 101 and 102 CT examinations, respectively, in patients <18 years old. Images were reviewed retrospectively. Objective measurement of the contrast enhancement and noise were analysed and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the abdominal aorta, portal vein, and liver were calculated. Four radiologists participated in subjective analysis using a four-point scale system to evaluate degrees of contrast enhancement, image noise, beam-hardening artefact, and overall image quality. Reader performance for correctly differentiating the two kinds of contrast media was evaluated.<br />Results: Regarding the objective measurement, contrast enhancement was significantly higher in the LOCM group (p<0.05). In subjective analysis, only CT using 120 kVp showed significantly stronger enhancement in the LOCM group (p=0.002), and sensitivity to differentiate the IOCM was 80.6%. Overall sensitivity and specificity for correctly differentiating IOCM were 57.1%, and 56.9%, respectively.<br />Conclusion: The application of IOCM was found to be feasible for performing paediatric abdominopelvic CT with a low tube voltage protocol. Although objective measurements of contrast enhancement were significantly lower in the IOCM group, subjective contrast enhancement and image quality assessments were not statistically different between groups.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-229X
Volume :
74
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31431254
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.027