Back to Search Start Over

Machine learning of clinical variables and coronary artery calcium scoring for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: analysis from the CONFIRM registry.

Authors :
Al'Aref SJ
Maliakal G
Singh G
van Rosendael AR
Ma X
Xu Z
Alawamlh OAH
Lee B
Pandey M
Achenbach S
Al-Mallah MH
Andreini D
Bax JJ
Berman DS
Budoff MJ
Cademartiri F
Callister TQ
Chang HJ
Chinnaiyan K
Chow BJW
Cury RC
DeLago A
Feuchtner G
Hadamitzky M
Hausleiter J
Kaufmann PA
Kim YJ
Leipsic JA
Maffei E
Marques H
Gonçalves PA
Pontone G
Raff GL
Rubinshtein R
Villines TC
Gransar H
Lu Y
Jones EC
Peña JM
Lin FY
Min JK
Shaw LJ
Source :
European heart journal [Eur Heart J] 2020 Jan 14; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 359-367.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Aims: Symptom-based pretest probability scores that estimate the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in stable chest pain have moderate accuracy. We sought to develop a machine learning (ML) model, utilizing clinical factors and the coronary artery calcium score (CACS), to predict the presence of obstructive CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).<br />Methods and Results: The study screened 35 281 participants enrolled in the CONFIRM registry, who underwent ≥64 detector row CCTA evaluation because of either suspected or previously established CAD. A boosted ensemble algorithm (XGBoost) was used, with data split into a training set (80%) on which 10-fold cross-validation was done and a test set (20%). Performance was assessed of the (1) ML model (using 25 clinical and demographic features), (2) ML + CACS, (3) CAD consortium clinical score, (4) CAD consortium clinical score + CACS, and (5) updated Diamond-Forrester (UDF) score. The study population comprised of 13 054 patients, of whom 2380 (18.2%) had obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis). Machine learning with CACS produced the best performance [area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881] compared with ML alone (AUC of 0.773), CAD consortium clinical score (AUC of 0.734), and with CACS (AUC of 0.866) and UDF (AUC of 0.682), P < 0.05 for all comparisons. CACS, age, and gender were the highest ranking features.<br />Conclusion: A ML model incorporating clinical features in addition to CACS can accurately estimate the pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD on CCTA. In clinical practice, the utilization of such an approach could improve risk stratification and help guide downstream management.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-9645
Volume :
41
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31513271
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz565