Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison between Aptima Assays (Hologic) and the Allplex STI Essential Assay (Seegene) for the diagnosis of Sexually transmitted infections.
- Source :
-
PloS one [PLoS One] 2019 Sep 12; Vol. 14 (9), pp. e0222439. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 12 (Print Publication: 2019). - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain a worldwide problem and a severe threat to public health. The purpose of this study was to compare Aptima® Assays (Hologic®) and the Allplex™ STI Essential Assay (Seegene®) for the simultaneous detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis and Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical practice. The Aptima® assays (Hologic®) are based on a transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) method. The Allplex™ STI Essential assay (Seegene®) is based on a multiplex Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) method. A total of 622 clinical samples from different anatomical sites were tested using both methods. A total of 88 (14.1%) and 66 (10.6%) positive samples were found for any of the TMA assays used and for the RT-PCR assay, respectively. Aptima® assays showed a slightly higher rate of positive results for all pathogens except for T. vaginalis, the results of which were similar to those obtained with Allplex™. The most commonly detected pathogen was C. trachomatis (37 samples; 5.9% using TMA assays) and the anatomical site with the highest prevalence of microorganisms was a non-urogenital site, the pharynx (27 positive samples; 4.3%). Using the Aptima® assays as reference method, the comparison showed that the average specificity of multiplex RT-PCR was 100.0% for the four pathogens. However an average sensitivity of 74.5% was observed, showing 95.2% (CI95%; 93.6-96.9) of overall concordance (κ = 0.80). In conclusion, the Aptima® assays show a higher sensitivity on a wide range of sample types compared to the Allplex™ assay.<br />Competing Interests: Federico García has received honoraria from Werfen, Hologic and Roche for participation in advisory boards and lectures related to the topic of the paper. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Chlamydia Infections diagnosis
Chlamydia trachomatis
Female
Gonorrhea diagnosis
Humans
Male
Mycoplasma Infections diagnosis
Mycoplasma genitalium
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Prevalence
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spain
Trichomonas Vaginitis diagnosis
Trichomonas vaginalis
Young Adult
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
Sexually Transmitted Diseases diagnosis
Sexually Transmitted Diseases epidemiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1932-6203
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- PloS one
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31513653
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222439