Back to Search Start Over

Racial disparities and the acute management of severe blunt traumatic brain injury.

Authors :
Sharma R
Johnson A
Li J
DeBoard Z
Zikakis I
Grotts J
Kaminski S
Source :
Trauma surgery & acute care open [Trauma Surg Acute Care Open] 2019 Sep 05; Vol. 4 (1), pp. e000358. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 05 (Print Publication: 2019).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. In patients with TBI, racial disparities have been shown to exist in patient outcomes. Identifying where disparities occur along the patient continuum of care will allow for targeted interventions. This study evaluated if racial disparity exists for neuromonitoring and neurointervention rates in patients with severe TBI due to blunt injury.<br />Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify patients aged 18 to 55 years old from 2007 through 2016 with a blunt injury, an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 to 8, a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 to 5, and all other anatomic Abbreviated Injury Scale scores less than 3. Coarsened exact matching (CEM) was used to balance covariates between white and non-white patients. Rates of neuromonitoring and neurosurgical interventions were compared between groups. Secondary outcomes were days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), total hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality.<br />Results: A total of 3692 patients with severe isolated TBI due to blunt injury were identified. After applying CEM, 1064 patients were analyzed (644 white, 420 non-white). No differences were observed between white and non-white patient groups for neuromonitoring, neurointervention, mortality, or ICU LOS. White patients had a shorter hospital LOS (8 days vs. 9 days, p<0.05) than non-white patients.<br />Discussion: For severe isolated blunt TBI, neuromonitoring, neurointervention, and mortality rates were similar for white and non-white patients. Although racial disparities in patient outcomes exist, these differences do not seem to be due to neuromonitoring and neurointervention rates for management of TBI.<br />Level of Evidence: Level III.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2397-5776
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Trauma surgery & acute care open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31565678
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2019-000358