Back to Search
Start Over
Test-Retest Performance of a 1-Hour Multiparametric MR Image Acquisition Pipeline With Orthotopic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts.
- Source :
-
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) [Tomography] 2019 Sep; Vol. 5 (3), pp. 320-331. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Preclinical imaging is critical in the development of translational strategies to detect diseases and monitor response to therapy. The National Cancer Institute Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program was launched, in part, to develop best practices in preclinical imaging. In this context, the objective of this work was to develop a 1-hour, multiparametric magnetic resonance image-acquisition pipeline with triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). The 1-hour, image-acquisition pipeline includes T1- and T2-weighted scans, quantitative T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameter maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) time-course images. Quality-control measures used phantoms. The triple-negative breast cancer PDXs used for this study averaged 174 ± 73 μL in volume, with region of interest-averaged T1, T2, and ADC values of 1.9 ± 0.2 seconds, 62 ± 3 milliseconds, and 0.71 ± 0.06 μm <superscript>2</superscript> /ms (mean ± SD), respectively. Specific focus was on assessing the within-subject test-retest coefficient-of-variation (CV <subscript>WS</subscript> ) for each of the magnetic resonance imaging metrics. Determination of PDX volume via manually drawn regions of interest is highly robust, with ∼1% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> . Determination of T2 is also robust with a ∼3% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> . Measurements of T1 and ADC are less robust with CV <subscript>WS</subscript> values in the 6%-11% range. Preliminary DCE test-retest time-course determinations, as quantified by area under the curve and K <superscript>trans</superscript> from 2-compartment exchange (extended Tofts) modeling, suggest that DCE is the least robust protocol, with ∼30%-40% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> .<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC.)
- Subjects :
- Animals
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Disease Models, Animal
Female
Heterografts diagnostic imaging
Heterografts pathology
Humans
Mice
Mice, Inbred Strains
Phantoms, Imaging
Random Allocation
Task Performance and Analysis
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms pathology
Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Contrast Media
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement methods
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2379-139X
- Volume :
- 5
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31572793
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00012