Back to Search Start Over

Test-Retest Performance of a 1-Hour Multiparametric MR Image Acquisition Pipeline With Orthotopic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts.

Authors :
Ge X
Quirk JD
Engelbach JA
Bretthorst GL
Li S
Shoghi KI
Garbow JR
Ackerman JJH
Source :
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) [Tomography] 2019 Sep; Vol. 5 (3), pp. 320-331.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Preclinical imaging is critical in the development of translational strategies to detect diseases and monitor response to therapy. The National Cancer Institute Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program was launched, in part, to develop best practices in preclinical imaging. In this context, the objective of this work was to develop a 1-hour, multiparametric magnetic resonance image-acquisition pipeline with triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). The 1-hour, image-acquisition pipeline includes T1- and T2-weighted scans, quantitative T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameter maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) time-course images. Quality-control measures used phantoms. The triple-negative breast cancer PDXs used for this study averaged 174 ± 73 μL in volume, with region of interest-averaged T1, T2, and ADC values of 1.9 ± 0.2 seconds, 62 ± 3 milliseconds, and 0.71 ± 0.06 μm <superscript>2</superscript> /ms (mean ± SD), respectively. Specific focus was on assessing the within-subject test-retest coefficient-of-variation (CV <subscript>WS</subscript> ) for each of the magnetic resonance imaging metrics. Determination of PDX volume via manually drawn regions of interest is highly robust, with ∼1% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> . Determination of T2 is also robust with a ∼3% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> . Measurements of T1 and ADC are less robust with CV <subscript>WS</subscript> values in the 6%-11% range. Preliminary DCE test-retest time-course determinations, as quantified by area under the curve and K <superscript>trans</superscript> from 2-compartment exchange (extended Tofts) modeling, suggest that DCE is the least robust protocol, with ∼30%-40% CV <subscript>WS</subscript> .<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2379-139X
Volume :
5
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31572793
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00012