Back to Search
Start Over
Clonality analysis of pulmonary tumors by genome-wide copy number profiling.
- Source :
-
PloS one [PLoS One] 2019 Oct 16; Vol. 14 (10), pp. e0223827. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 16 (Print Publication: 2019). - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Multiple tumors in patients are frequently diagnosed, either synchronous or metachronous. The distinction between a second primary and a metastasis is important for treatment. Chromosomal DNA copy number aberrations (CNA) patterns are highly unique to specific tumors. The aim of this study was to assess genome-wide CNA-patterns as method to identify clonally related tumors in a prospective cohort of patients with synchronous or metachronous tumors, with at least one intrapulmonary tumor. In total, 139 tumor pairs from 90 patients were examined: 35 synchronous and 104 metachronous pairs. Results of CNA were compared to histological type, clinicopathological methods (Martini-Melamed-classification (MM) and ACCP-2013-criteria), and, if available, EGFR- and KRAS-mutation analysis. CNA-results were clonal in 74 pairs (53%), non-clonal in 33 pairs (24%), and inconclusive in 32 pairs (23%). Histological similarity was found in 130 pairs (94%). Concordance between histology and conclusive CNA-results was 69% (74 of 107 pairs: 72 clonal and two non-clonal). In 31 of 103 pairs with similar histology, genetics revealed non-clonality. In two out of four pairs with non-matching histology, genetics revealed clonality. The subgroups of synchronous and metachronous pairs showed similar outcome for the comparison of histological versus CNA-results. MM-classification and ACCP-2013-criteria, applicable on 34 pairs, and CNA-results were concordant in 50% and 62% respectively. Concordance between mutation matching and conclusive CNA-results was 89% (8 of 9 pairs: six clonal and two non-clonal). Interestingly, in one patient both tumors had the same KRAS mutation, but the CNA result was non-clonal. In conclusion, although some concordance between histological comparison and CNA profiling is present, arguments exist to prefer extensive molecular testing to determine whether a second tumor is a metastasis or a second primary.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clone Cells chemistry
Clone Cells pathology
Diagnosis, Differential
ErbB Receptors genetics
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms genetics
Lung Neoplasms secondary
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasms, Second Primary genetics
Prospective Studies
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) genetics
Retrospective Studies
Whole Genome Sequencing
Comparative Genomic Hybridization methods
DNA Copy Number Variations
Lung Neoplasms diagnosis
Neoplasms, Second Primary diagnosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1932-6203
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- PloS one
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31618260
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223827