Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Cryopreserved Arterial Allografts Versus Heparin-bonded Vascular Grafts in Infragenicular Bypass for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.
- Source :
-
Annals of vascular surgery [Ann Vasc Surg] 2020 Apr; Vol. 64, pp. 33-42. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 16. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The purpose of this study was to compare cryopreserved arterial allograft (CAA) to heparin-bonded prosthesis (HBP) in infragenicular bypasses for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).<br />Methods: This retrospective study took place in 2 university hospitals and included 41 consecutive patients treated for CLTI. In the absence of a suitable saphenous vein, an infragenicular bypass was performed using either CAA (24 cases) or HBP (17 cases). Kaplan-Meyer analysis compared primary and secondary patency and amputation-free survival rates. Binomial logistic regression analyzed risk factors for major amputation and thrombosis.<br />Results: The mean followup was 18.5 months (±14.3) in the CAA group, 17.6 (±6.1) in the HBP group. In the CAA group, primary and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 52% (±10.6) and 61% (±10.3), compared to 88% (±7.8) and 94% (±5.7) in the HBP group, respectively. The difference in patency rates was not statistically different (P = 0.27 and P = 0.28, respectively). The statistically significant factors of graft thrombosis were, a stage 4 from the WIfI classification (Wound Ischemia foot Infection) with a 6 times higher risk (P = 0.04), and a distal anastomosis on a leg artery with a 9 times higher risk of thrombosis (P = 0.03). Amputation-free survival rates at 18 months were similar between the groups (CCA: 75% (±9) versus HBP: 94% (±6), P = 0.11). Patients classified as WIfI stage 4 had 13 times higher odds to undergo major amputation than patients with WIfI stage 2 or 3 (95% CI, 1.16-160.93; P = 0.04). The intervention was longer in the CCA group of 74 min (278 min ± 86) compared to the HBP group (203 min ± 69). This difference was statistically significant (95% CI, 17.86-132.98), t(35) = 2.671, P = 0.01.<br />Conclusions: CCA is not superior to HBP in infragenicular bypasses for CLTI, and may not be worth the extra cost and the longer operative duration.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Allografts
Amputation, Surgical
Anticoagulants adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Chronic Disease
Cryopreservation
Female
France
Graft Occlusion, Vascular etiology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular physiopathology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular surgery
Heparin adverse effects
Humans
Ischemia diagnostic imaging
Ischemia physiopathology
Limb Salvage
Male
Middle Aged
Peripheral Arterial Disease diagnostic imaging
Peripheral Arterial Disease physiopathology
Progression-Free Survival
Prosthesis Design
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thrombosis etiology
Thrombosis physiopathology
Thrombosis surgery
Time Factors
Vascular Patency
Anticoagulants administration & dosage
Bioprosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Heparin administration & dosage
Ischemia surgery
Peripheral Arterial Disease surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1615-5947
- Volume :
- 64
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Annals of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31629123
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.09.003