Satisfaction with life, health and well-being: comparison between non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, traumatic spinal cord injury and Australian norms.

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare self-reported satisfaction with life, and self-reported health and well-being of people with NTSCD, to that of people with TSCI, and with Australian population.
Setting: Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Participants completed surveys by post or email. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used to assess self-reported satisfaction with life, and health and well-being. Descriptive statistics are reported including median and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to investigate differences between groups.
Results: There were 41 participants: NTSCD ( n  = 14) and TSCI ( n  = 27). There were no significant differences in the median scores on the SWLS for NTSCD and TSCI, but both groups scored lower than the Australian non-disabled sample mean. There were significant differences between NTSCD and TSCI for SF-36 domains physical functioning, role limitations physical and vitality ( p  < 0.05). Median scores for both groups in all eight domains were lower than the means of the comparative Australian sample, except for role limitations emotional.
Conclusions: There were more apparent difficulties for people with NTSCD in completing desired functional tasks than those with TSCI. Both groups had lower self-reported satisfaction with life, and lower reported health and well-being in comparison to samples of non-disabled Australians.
Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
(© International Spinal Cord Society 2019.)