Back to Search Start Over

How do trees respond to species mixing in experimental compared to observational studies?

Authors :
Kambach S
Allan E
Bilodeau-Gauthier S
Coomes DA
Haase J
Jucker T
Kunstler G
Müller S
Nock C
Paquette A
van der Plas F
Ratcliffe S
Roger F
Ruiz-Benito P
Scherer-Lorenzen M
Auge H
Bouriaud O
Castagneyrol B
Dahlgren J
Gamfeldt L
Jactel H
Kändler G
Koricheva J
Lehtonen A
Muys B
Ponette Q
Setiawan N
Van de Peer T
Verheyen K
Zavala MA
Bruelheide H
Source :
Ecology and evolution [Ecol Evol] 2019 Sep 10; Vol. 9 (19), pp. 11254-11265. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 10 (Print Publication: 2019).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

For decades, ecologists have investigated the effects of tree species diversity on tree productivity at different scales and with different approaches ranging from observational to experimental study designs. Using data from five European national forest inventories (16,773 plots), six tree species diversity experiments (584 plots), and six networks of comparative plots (169 plots), we tested whether tree species growth responses to species mixing are consistent and therefore transferrable between those different research approaches. Our results confirm the general positive effect of tree species mixing on species growth (16% on average) but we found no consistency in species-specific responses to mixing between any of the three approaches, even after restricting comparisons to only those plots that shared similar mixtures compositions and forest types. These findings highlight the necessity to consider results from different research approaches when selecting species mixtures that should maximize positive forest biodiversity and functioning relationships.<br />Competing Interests: None declared.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-7758
Volume :
9
Issue :
19
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ecology and evolution
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31641470
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5627