Back to Search
Start Over
Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Thrombocytopenic Haematological Patients for Invasive Fungal Infections Diagnosis: A Monocentric, Retrospective Experience.
- Source :
-
Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases [Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis] 2019 Nov 01; Vol. 11 (1), pp. e2019065. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 01 (Print Publication: 2019). - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background: Although bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) measurements of galactomannan antigen (GM) seems to be more sensitive than serum testing to detect invasive fungal infection (IFI), a consensus on the most appropriate diagnostic threshold of the BAL GM test is still unclear. Moreover, there is uncertainty as to whether BAL is a safe procedure in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) and thrombocytopenia.<br />Objectives: Based on this background, 102 adult patients with HM and associated thrombocytopenia were retrospectively analyzed with the dual aim of 1) determining whether BAL is a safe and feasible procedure; and, 2) identifying the most appropriate threshold for GM positivity in the diagnosis of IFI.<br />Patients/methods: each BAL was considered as one case/patient. One hundred twelve BALs were carried out in 102 HM patients: at the time of the BAL, the median platelet count (PLTs) in all patients was 47×10 <superscript>9</superscript> /L (1-476), and 31 patients (27%) had PLTs< 20×10 <superscript>9</superscript> /L.<br />Results: complications from the BAL were infrequent (3.5%) and mild. No bleeding was reported. The BAL GM cut off of >0.8 was associated with the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 72.97% and specificity 80%). Antifungal treatment of patients with BAL GM >0.8 resulted in a clinical-radiological improvement in 35/41 patients (85%).<br />Conclusions: BAL was a safe procedure also in thrombocytopenic patients, permitting an IFI diagnosis not otherwise identifiable using EORTC/MSG criteria. Our data suggest that a BAL GM value of>0.8 represents the most useful cut-off in terms of sensibility and specificity. Further prospective studies on a more significant number of patients are needed to confirm these results.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of Interest.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2035-3006
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31700590
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4084/MJHID.2019.065