Back to Search Start Over

Kava for generalised anxiety disorder: A 16-week double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study.

Authors :
Sarris J
Byrne GJ
Bousman CA
Cribb L
Savage KM
Holmes O
Murphy J
Macdonald P
Short A
Nazareth S
Jennings E
Thomas SR
Ogden E
Chamoli S
Scholey A
Stough C
Source :
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry [Aust N Z J Psychiatry] 2020 Mar; Vol. 54 (3), pp. 288-297. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 08.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: Previous randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have shown that Kava (a South Pacific medicinal plant) reduced anxiety during short-term administration. The objective of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to perform a larger, longer-term trial assessing the efficacy and safety of Kava in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder and to determine whether gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter (SLC6A1) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were moderators of response.<br />Methods: The trial was a phase III, multi-site, two-arm, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating an aqueous extract of dried Kava root administered twice per day in tablet form (standardised to 120 mg of kavalactones twice/day) in 171 currently non-medicated anxious participants with diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder. The trial took place in Australia.<br />Results: An analysis of 171 participants revealed a non-significant difference in anxiety reduction between the Kava and placebo groups (a relative reduction favouring placebo of 1.37 points; p = 0.25). At the conclusion of the controlled phase, 17.4% of the Kava group were classified as remitted (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score < 7) compared to 23.8% of the placebo group ( p = 0.46). No SLC6A1 polymorphisms were associated with treatment response, while carriers of the rs2601126 T allele preferentially respond to placebo ( p = 0.006). Kava was well tolerated aside from poorer memory (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.044) and tremor/shakiness (Kava = 36 vs placebo = 23; p = 0.024) occurring more frequently in the Kava group. Liver function test abnormalities were significantly more frequent in the Kava group, although no participant met criteria for herb-induced hepatic injury.<br />Conclusion: While research has generally supported Kava in non-clinical populations (potentially for more 'situational' anxiety as a short-term anxiolytic), this particular extract was not effective for diagnosed generalised anxiety disorder.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1440-1614
Volume :
54
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31813230
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419891246