Back to Search Start Over

A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE).

Authors :
Cloughesy TF
Brenner A
de Groot JF
Butowski NA
Zach L
Campian JL
Ellingson BM
Freedman LS
Cohen YC
Lowenton-Spier N
Rachmilewitz Minei T
Fain Shmueli S
Wen PY
Source :
Neuro-oncology [Neuro Oncol] 2020 May 15; Vol. 22 (5), pp. 705-717.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Ofranergene obadenovec (VB-111) is an anticancer viral therapy that demonstrated in a phase II study a survival benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that was continued after progression with concomitant bevacizumab.<br />Methods: This pivotal phase III randomized, controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive VB-111 1013 viral particles every 8 weeks in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (combination arm) or bevacizumab monotherapy (control arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and progression-free survival (PFS).<br />Results: Enrolled were 256 patients at 57 sites. Median exposure to VB-111 was 4 months. The study did not meet its primary or secondary goals. Median OS was 6.8 versus 7.9 months in the combination versus control arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI: 0.91-1.59; Pā€…=ā€…0.19) and ORR was 27.3% versus 21.9% (Pā€…=ā€…0.26). A higher rate of grades 3-5 adverse events was reported in the combination arm (67% vs 40%), mainly attributed to a higher rate of CNS and flu-like/fever events. Trends for improved survival with combination treatment were seen in the subgroup of patients with smaller tumors and in patients who had a posttreatment febrile reaction.<br />Conclusions: In this study, upfront concomitant administration of VB-111 and bevacizumab failed to improve outcomes in rGBM. Change of treatment regimen, with the lack of VB-111 monotherapy priming, may explain the differences from the favorable phase II results.<br />Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02511405.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1523-5866
Volume :
22
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neuro-oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31844890
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz232