Back to Search Start Over

A prenatal diagnosis and genetics study of five pedigrees in the Chinese population with Xp22.31 microduplication.

Authors :
Zhuang J
Wang Y
Zeng S
Lv C
Lin Y
Jiang Y
Source :
Molecular cytogenetics [Mol Cytogenet] 2019 Dec 11; Vol. 12, pp. 50. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 11 (Print Publication: 2019).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Copy number variations (CNVs) can contribute to human phenotype, phenotypic diversity and disease susceptibility, while others may benign. In the current study, an attempt to investigate the pathogenicity of CNVs in chromosome Xp22.31 was explored.<br />Methods: G-banding and SNP-array techniques were used to analyze chromosome karyotypes and CNVs in fetuses. Parents associate with five different pedigrees possessing high risk factors in pregnancy were considered with such parameters as advanced age, high risk of serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities.<br />Results: The fetuses' amniotic fluid karyotypes were 46, XX and those of their parents with the five pedigrees revealed no abnormalities. Here, we noticed a series of individuals with Xp22.31 duplications ranging from 534.6 kb to 1.6 Mb. It was detected through SNP array that the fetuses in Pedigree 1 and 2 had ~ 600 kb duplications in the Xp22.31 region of their X chromosomes which contained two OMIM genes, HDHD1 (OMIM: 306480) and part of STS (OMIM: 300747). The fetuses of Pedigrees 3, 4 and 5 had 1.6 Mb duplication in the same chromosome which contained four OMIM genes: HDHD1 (OMIM: 306480), STS (OMIM: 300747), PNPLA4 (OMIM: 300102) and VCX (OMIM: 300229). The duplications in the fetuses of Pedigrees 1 and 5 were inherited from the non-phenotypic parents. Pedigrees 3 and 4 refused to perform parental verification. Finally, four of the five pedigrees continue towards pregnancy with no abnormalities being observed during followed-ups.<br />Conclusion: Our study first showed duplications of Xp22.31 in Chinese population. Clinical and genetic investigation on five different pedigrees, we consider the duplication of these fragments as likely benign copy number variants (CNVs). We suggest that the duplications of Xp22.31 with recurrent duplication as a benign CNVs .<br />Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors’ declare that they have nocompeting interests.<br /> (© The Author(s). 2019.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1755-8166
Volume :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Molecular cytogenetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31857824
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0461-1