Back to Search Start Over

Angiogenesis and follicular development in ovarian tissue of cattle following vitrification and post-warming culture on chicken chorioallantoic membrane.

Authors :
Beck K
Singh J
Dar MA
Anzar M
Source :
Animal reproduction science [Anim Reprod Sci] 2020 Jan; Vol. 212, pp. 106254. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 05.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the viability and growth of follicles in ovarian tissues of cattle vitrified using two non-permeating cryoprotectants (sucrose and trehalose) and two cryodevices (cryovial and cryotop). Cortical slices (1-2 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ) from cattle ovaries (n = 5) were assigned to one of the 14 treatment groups. Cortical slices were vitrified in a TCM199 medium supplemented with ethylene glycol, DMSO, calf serum and either 0.5 M sucrose or trehalose, in cryovials or on cryotops. After warming, cortical slices were either fixed immediately for histology or grafted on a chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of 10-day old chick embryos. Angiogenesis in ovarian tissues was determined. Viable and atretic preantral (primordial, primary and secondary) follicle densities were examined histologically. There was angiogenesis (chicken) in cortical slices grafted on the CAM by day 5 of culture, however, there was no difference for blood vessel densities when there was use of non-permeating cryoprotectants or cryodevices. Total, viable and atretic follicle densities did not differ (P > 0.05) with use of non-permeating cryoprotectants or cryodevices. The proportion of viable follicles was greater (P < 0.001) in fresh-control than CAM culture-control or vitrification groups. The inclusion of sucrose in the vitrification solution resulted in a larger number of atretic follicles than in the fresh-control group (P < 0.05). In summary, sucrose and trehalose, and cryotop and cryovial were equally suitable for vitrification of ovarian tissues of cattle. Vitrification of ovarian tissues of cattle with subsequent use of CAM culture adversely affected follicular development.<br /> (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-2232
Volume :
212
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Animal reproduction science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31864494
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106254