Back to Search Start Over

Follow-up program for blood donors with unconfirmed screening results reveals a high false-positive rate in Dalian, China.

Authors :
Deng X
Zang L
Wang X
Chen H
Liu J
Gao Y
Xu S
Wang L
Fan Y
Candotti D
Liang X
Source :
Transfusion [Transfusion] 2020 Feb; Vol. 60 (2), pp. 334-342. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 07.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Chinese blood donors with unconfirmed serological and/or molecular screening results are deferred permanently. This study investigated the implementation and performance of a follow-up program aiming to improve the notification and management of deferred donors in Dalian, China.<br />Study Design and Methods: From January 2013 to February 2018, 411,216 donations were tested for HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV/HIV antigen, and antibodies to Treponema pallidum. HBV, HCV, and HIV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed in mini-pools of six or in individual donations (IDs). Reactive donations were evaluated further with alternative serological assays and ID-NAT re-testing. A follow-up procedure was developed to evaluate a subset of deferred donors that were either potential NAT yield cases, serology non-reactive and NAT non-repeated reactive (NRR), or serology NRR irrespective of NAT result.<br />Results: Serological and molecular routine, plus supplemental testing, identified HBV, HCV, HIV, and TP in 503 (0.12%), 392 (0.09%), 156 (0.04%), and 2041 (0.49%) donations, respectively. Overall, 683 of 4156 (16.4%) eligible donors and 205 donors deferred prior 2013 participated in the program. They included 664 serology NRR and 224 NAT yield cases, and 58.8% repeat donors. All markers combined, follow-up documented false reactivity, primary acute infections, and OBI in 61.9% (550/888), 3.3% (29/888), and 12.8% (114/888) of these donors, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc or anti-HBs reactivity was observed in 22% of cases.<br />Conclusion: Follow-up testing refined infection status in 78.0% (693/888) of deferred donors with unconfirmed screening results. This high false-positive rate encouraged to reevaluate the current screening strategies and to consider donor reentry.<br /> (© 2020 AABB.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-2995
Volume :
60
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31909495
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15656