Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of renal function on clinical outcomes after PCI in ACS and stable CAD patients treated with ticagrelor: a prespecified analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS randomized clinical trial.
- Source :
-
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society [Clin Res Cardiol] 2020 Jul; Vol. 109 (7), pp. 930-943. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 10. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Impaired renal function (IRF) is associated with increased risks of both ischemic and bleeding events. Ticagrelor has been shown to provide greater absolute reduction in ischemic risk following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in those with versus without IRF.<br />Methods: A pre-specified sub-analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial (n = 15,991) comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (after 1-month ticagrelor and aspirin dual anti-platelet therapy [DAPT]) with 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients stratified according to IRF (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m <superscript>2</superscript> ).<br />Results: At 2 years, patients with IRF (n = 2171) had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI](hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.98, p <subscript>adj</subscript> = 0.001), all-cause death, site-reported MI, all revascularization and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding, compared with patients without IRF. Among patients with IRF, there were similar rates of the primary endpoint (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11, p = 0.192, p <subscript>int</subscript> = 0.680) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.71-1.71, p = 0.656, p <subscript>int</subscript> = 0.506) in the experimental versus the reference group. No significant interactions were seen between IRF and treatment effect for any of the secondary outcome variables. Among ACS patients with IRF, there were no between-group differences in the rates of the primary endpoint or BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding; however, the rates of the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, any stroke, MI, or revascularization (p <subscript>int</subscript> = 0.028) and net adverse clinical events (POCE and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding) (p <subscript>int</subscript> = 0.045), were lower in the experimental versus the reference group. No treatment effects were found in stable CAD patients categorized according to presence of IRF.<br />Conclusions: IRF negatively impacted long-term prognosis after PCI. There were no differential treatment effects found with regard to all-cause death or new Q-wave MI after PCI in patients with IRF treated with ticagrelor monotherapy.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: The trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01813435.
- Subjects :
- Acute Coronary Syndrome complications
Acute Coronary Syndrome physiopathology
Aged
Coronary Artery Disease complications
Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology
Drug-Eluting Stents
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors therapeutic use
Ticagrelor therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Renal Insufficiency complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1861-0692
- Volume :
- 109
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31925529
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01586-9