Back to Search Start Over

Lung mechanical properties distinguish children with asthma with normal and diminished lung function.

Authors :
Comberiati P
Spahn JD
Paull K
Faino A
Cherniack R
Covar RA
Source :
Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Clin Exp Allergy] 2020 Apr; Vol. 50 (4), pp. 453-462. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 06.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Children with asthma, even those with severe persistent disease, can have forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV <subscript>1</subscript> ) values ≥100% of predicted, while others have diminished FEV <subscript>1</subscript> .<br />Objective: We sought to characterize the lung mechanical properties underlying these two asthma phenotypes and the mechanisms explaining the paradox of severe asthmatic children, whom when clinically stable can have an FEV <subscript>1</subscript> >100% of predicted, but during an acute bronchospastic episode can experience a life-threatening asthma event.<br />Methods: Lung mechanics were evaluated in three groups of children: asthmatics with FEV <subscript>1</subscript> ≥100% (HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> ; n = 13), asthmatics with FEV <subscript>1</subscript> ≤80% (LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> ; n = 14) and non-asthmatic controls (n = 10). A linear mixed model was used to examine the relationship between volume and static transpulmonary pressures obtained at total lung capacity (TLC); actual TLC %of predicted and flow; and static transpulmonary pressure and flow.<br />Results: HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> asthmatics had larger airways (FEV <subscript>1</subscript> z-scores 1.12 vs -2.37; P < .05), greater lung volumes (mean % of predicted TLC 134.8% vs 109.6%; P < .05) and lower airway resistance (mean %of predicted Raw 101.9% vs 199.9%; P < .05) compared to the LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> group. Moreover, HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> asthmatics had significantly reduced elastic recoil pressure (pressure-volume curve shifted upward and to the left) and higher lung compliance (0.21 vs 00.9 L/cm H <subscript>2</subscript> O; P < .05) compared to the LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> group. The pressure-flow curves revealed the LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> group to have significantly increased resistance to flow in the upstream segment of the airways at all lung volumes studied compared to HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> .<br />Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> asthmatic children display distinct lung mechanical proprieties compared to their LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> asthmatic peers. With loss of elastic recoil pressure, the HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> group could generate normal FEV <subscript>1</subscript> due to proportionally enlarged airways and reduced airway resistance, while airflow limitation in the LFEV <subscript>1</subscript> is due to increased airway resistance. Loss of elastic recoil and interdependence during acute bronchoconstriction episodes may predispose the HFEV <subscript>1</subscript> group to catastrophic reductions in airflow.<br /> (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2222
Volume :
50
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31955479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13573