Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-effectiveness of five versus ten years of alendronate treatment prior to drug holiday for women with osteoporosis.
- Source :
-
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA [Osteoporos Int] 2020 Jul; Vol. 31 (7), pp. 1273-1282. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 04. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for US postmenopausal women with hip BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5. We found that for most postmenopausal women 5 years of treatment prior to drug holiday is the more effective and cost-effective option.<br />Introduction: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare 5 versus 10 years of alendronate treatment prior to 5-year drug holiday for postmenopausal osteoporotic women.<br />Methods: We created an individual-level state-transition microsimulation model to compare 3 treatment strategies for US postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and femoral neck BMD T-scores between - 2.5 and - 3.5 at baseline: recurrent periods of 5 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 5/5), recurrent periods of 10 years of alendronate followed by 5 years of drug holiday (alendronate 10/5), and no alendronate treatment.<br />Results: Base-case analysis revealed for women initiating treatment at ages 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy dominated (was more effective and less costly than) the alendronate 10/5 strategy and no treatment. For women age 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy dominated. When assuming a lower relative risk of nonvertebral fracture during years 6-10 of alendronate treatment than the base-case assumption, the alendronate 10/5 strategy became the most cost-effective strategy even at younger treatment initiation ages. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings; for treatment initiation ages of 50, 60, and 70, the alendronate 5/5 strategy was favored, whereas for treatment initiation age of 80, the alendronate 10/5 strategy was favored; however, there was uncertainty in these findings.<br />Conclusions: After 5 years of alendronate treatment, younger postmenopausal women (ages 50-70) with osteoporosis would likely benefit from a drug holiday, whereas older women (age 80) are likely to benefit from treatment for 10 years before a drug holiday.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alendronate economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Alendronate therapeutic use
Bone Density Conservation Agents economics
Bone Density Conservation Agents therapeutic use
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal drug therapy
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1433-2965
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32020265
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05258-2