Back to Search Start Over

Clinical risk factors and atherosclerotic plaque extent to define risk for major events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the long-term coronary computed tomography angiography CONFIRM registry.

Authors :
van Rosendael AR
Bax AM
Smit JM
van den Hoogen IJ
Ma X
Al'Aref S
Achenbach S
Al-Mallah MH
Andreini D
Berman DS
Budoff MJ
Cademartiri F
Callister TQ
Chang HJ
Chinnaiyan K
Chow BJW
Cury RC
DeLago A
Feuchtner G
Hadamitzky M
Hausleiter J
Kaufmann PA
Kim YJ
Leipsic JA
Maffei E
Marques H
de Araújo Gonçalves P
Pontone G
Raff GL
Rubinshtein R
Villines TC
Gransar H
Lu Y
Peña JM
Lin FY
Shaw LJ
Min JK
Bax JJ
Source :
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging [Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging] 2020 May 01; Vol. 21 (5), pp. 479-488.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Aims: In patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), we examined the prognostic value of risk factors and atherosclerotic extent.<br />Methods and Results: Patients from the long-term CONFIRM registry without prior CAD and without obstructive (≥50%) stenosis were included. Within the groups of normal coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (N = 1849) and non-obstructive CAD (N = 1698), the prognostic value of traditional clinical risk factors and atherosclerotic extent (segment involvement score, SIS) was assessed with Cox models. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or late revascularization. In total, 3547 patients were included (age 57.9 ± 12.1 years, 57.8% male), experiencing 460 MACE during 5.4 years of follow-up. Age, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes were the clinical variables associated with increased MACE risk, but the magnitude of risk was higher for CCTA defined atherosclerotic extent; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for SIS >5 was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-4.9) while HR for diabetes and hypertension were 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) and 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.7), respectively. Exclusion of revascularization as endpoint did not modify the results. In normal CCTA, presence of ≥1 traditional risk factors did not worsen prognosis (log-rank P = 0.248), while it did in non-obstructive CAD (log-rank P = 0.025). Adjusted for SIS, hypertension and diabetes predicted MACE risk in non-obstructive CAD, while diabetes did not increase risk in absence of CAD (P-interaction = 0.004).<br />Conclusion: Among patients without obstructive CAD, the extent of CAD provides more prognostic information for MACE than traditional cardiovascular risk factors. An interaction was observed between risk factors and CAD burden, suggesting synergistic effects of both.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2047-2412
Volume :
21
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32065624
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez322