Back to Search
Start Over
Intraoperative fluoroscopy shows better agreement and interchangeability in tibial tunnel location during single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography compared with an intraoperative image-free navigation system.
- Source :
-
The Knee [Knee] 2020 Jun; Vol. 27 (3), pp. 809-816. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 13. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Fluoroscopy and navigation systems provide an accurate and reproducible method of guiding anatomical tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The aim was to evaluate the differences in tibial tunnel location assessed by both an intraoperative navigation system and fluoroscopy, validated using a one-week postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).<br />Methods: The tibial tunnel location in a consecutive series of 35 patients who received a single-bundle ACLR was evaluated by intraoperative navigation system, fluoroscopic image and compared with postoperative 3DCT position. The location to the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) direction were compared between all three methods.<br />Results: The tibial tunnel locations were 46.7 ± 4.5%, 44.5 ± 1.9%, and 43.6 ± 2.4% in ML direction, and 42.8 ± 7.6%, 37.9 ± 3.8%, and 37.9 ± 3.7% in AP direction using an intraoperative navigation system, fluoroscopic image and postoperative 3DCT, respectively. Significant differences between the navigation system and fluoroscopic image (ML, P = 0.001; AP, P = 0.006), and the navigation system and 3DCT (ML, P = 0.001; AP, P < 0.001) were seen. However, there was no significant difference between fluoroscopy and 3DCT (ML, P = 0.315; AP, P = 0.999). There was a significant lack of agreement for analyses measured using a navigation system and 3DCT. Fluoroscopy and 3DCT demonstrated an acceptable agreement (ML, r <subscript>pt</subscript>  = -0.21, P = 0.232; AP, r <subscript>pt</subscript>  = 0.04, P = 0.826).<br />Conclusions: A tibial tunnel location assessed by intraoperative fluoroscopy shows better agreement and interchangeability with one-week postoperative 3DCT validation during single-bundle ACLR compared with an intraoperative image-free navigation system.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries surgery
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Care
Male
Postoperative Period
Reproducibility of Results
Tibia surgery
Young Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Fluoroscopy
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Tibia diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-5800
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Knee
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32178971
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.017