Back to Search Start Over

Acute stress affects implicit but not explicit motor imagery: A pilot study.

Authors :
Schlatter S
Guillot A
Faes C
Saruco E
Collet C
Di Rienzo F
Debarnot U
Source :
International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology [Int J Psychophysiol] 2020 Jun; Vol. 152, pp. 62-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 14.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) is the capacity to mentally perform one or a set of movements without concomitant overt action. MI training has been show to enhance the subsequent motor performance. While the benefits of MI to manage stress have been extensively documented, the reverse impact of stress on MI received far less attention. The present study thus aimed to evaluate whether acute stress might influence MI abilities. Thirty participants were assigned either to a stress or a control group. The Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test (SECPT) was used to induce stress, with heart rate, electrodermal activity, salivary cortisol, and self-report perceived levels of stress being monitored during the experiment. Stress induction was followed by both implicit (laterality judgment) and explicit (sequential pointing) MI tasks. Main results showed a deleterious impact of stress on implicit MI, while explicit MI was not altered. These exploratory findings provide a deeper understanding of stress effects on cognition, and practically support that under stressful conditions, as during a sport competition or rehabilitation contexts, explicit MI should be prioritized.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We have no competing interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-7697
Volume :
152
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32302646
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.04.011