Back to Search Start Over

Impact of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging on biopsy and radical prostatectomy grade concordance.

Authors :
Shoag JE
Cai PY
Gross MD
Gaffney C
Li D
Mao J
Nowels M
Scherr DS
Sedrakyan A
Hu JC
Source :
Cancer [Cancer] 2020 Jul 01; Vol. 126 (13), pp. 2986-2990. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 22.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Adoption of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before biopsy is based on evidence demonstrating superior detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy. Whether this is due to the detection of otherwise occult higher grade cancers or preferential sampling of higher grade areas within an otherwise low-grade cancer is unknown.<br />Methods: To distinguish these two possibilities, this study examined the effect of prebiopsy MRI on the rate of pathologic upgrading and downgrading at prostatectomy in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2010 to 2015. Logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of MRI use on the Gleason grade change between biopsy and prostatectomy.<br />Results: Among biopsy-naive men, those who underwent prebiopsy MRI had higher odds of downgrading at prostatectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.66). In contrast, the odds of upgrading were significantly lower for men who underwent prebiopsy MRI (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). Limitations included a low overall rate of MRI-utilization prior to biopsy and an inability to distinguish between template, software-assisted and cognitive fusion biopsy.<br />Conclusions: Prebiopsy MRI is associated with both oversampling of higher grade areas, which results in downgrading at prostatectomy, and the detection of otherwise occult higher grade lesions, which results in less upgrading at prostatectomy.<br /> (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0142
Volume :
126
Issue :
13
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32320063
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32821