Back to Search Start Over

New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop.

Authors :
Mahony C
Ashton RS
Birk B
Boobis AR
Cull T
Daston GP
Ewart L
Knudsen TB
Manou I
Maurer-Stroh S
Margiotta-Casaluci L
Müller BP
Nordlund P
Roberts RA
Steger-Hartmann T
Vandenbossche E
Viant MR
Vinken M
Whelan M
Zvonimir Z
Cronin MTD
Source :
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP [Regul Toxicol Pharmacol] 2020 Jul; Vol. 114, pp. 104668. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 23.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a 'Blue Sky Workshop' on new ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity. The aim of the Workshop was to formulate strategic ideas to improve and increase the applicability, implementation and acceptance of modern non-animal methods to determine systemic toxicity. The Workshop concluded that good progress is being made to assess repeated dose toxicity without animals taking advantage of existing knowledge in toxicology, thresholds of toxicological concern, adverse outcome pathways and read-across workflows. These approaches can be supported by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) utilising modern molecular technologies and computational methods. Recommendations from the Workshop were based around the needs for better chemical safety assessment: how to strengthen the evidence base for decision making; to develop, standardise and harmonise NAMs for human toxicity; and the improvement in the applicability and acceptance of novel techniques. "Disruptive thinking" is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and the opportunities to move away from reliance on animal tests. Case study practices and data sharing, ensuring reproducibility of NAMs, were viewed as crucial to the improvement of non-animal test approaches for systemic toxicity.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Some of the authors received reimbursement of their travel expenses by the EPAA to make their participation in the workshop possible. If deemed necessary, a list of those people who received travel expenses support can be provided.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-0295
Volume :
114
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32335207
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104668