Back to Search Start Over

Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer from Tyrosine in the Interior of a de novo Protein: Mechanisms and Primary Proton Acceptor.

Authors :
Nilsen-Moe A
Reinhardt CR
Glover SD
Liang L
Hammes-Schiffer S
Hammarström L
Tommos C
Source :
Journal of the American Chemical Society [J Am Chem Soc] 2020 Jul 01; Vol. 142 (26), pp. 11550-11559. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 17.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) from tyrosine produces a neutral tyrosyl radical (Y <superscript>•</superscript> ) that is vital to many catalytic redox reactions. To better understand how the protein environment influences the PCET properties of tyrosine, we have studied the radical formation behavior of Y <subscript>32</subscript> in the α <subscript>3</subscript> Y model protein. The previously solved α <subscript>3</subscript> Y solution NMR structure shows that Y <subscript>32</subscript> is sequestered ∼7.7 ± 0.3 Å below the protein surface without any primary proton acceptors nearby. Here we present transient absorption kinetic data and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to resolve the PCET mechanism associated with Y <subscript>32</subscript> oxidation. Y <subscript>32</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> was generated in a bimolecular reaction with [Ru(bpy) <subscript>3</subscript> ] <superscript>3+</superscript> formed by flash photolysis. At pH > 8, the rate constant of Y <subscript>32</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> formation ( k <subscript>PCET</subscript> ) increases by one order of magnitude per pH unit, corresponding to a proton-first mechanism via tyrosinate (PTET). At lower pH < 7.5, the pH dependence is weak and shows a previously measured KIE ≈ 2.5, which best fits a concerted mechanism. k <subscript>PCET</subscript> is independent of phosphate buffer concentration at pH 6.5. This provides clear evidence that phosphate buffer is not the primary proton acceptor. MD simulations show that one to two water molecules can enter the hydrophobic cavity of α <subscript>3</subscript> Y and hydrogen bond to Y <subscript>32</subscript> , as well as the possibility of hydrogen-bonding interactions between Y <subscript>32</subscript> and E <subscript>13</subscript> , through structural fluctuations that reorient surrounding side chains. Our results illustrate how protein conformational motions can influence the redox reactivity of a tyrosine residue and how PCET mechanisms can be tuned by changing the pH even when the PCET occurs within the interior of a protein.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1520-5126
Volume :
142
Issue :
26
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32479070
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c04655