Back to Search Start Over

Multicentric, prospective observational data show sperm capacitation predicts male fertility, and cohort comparison reveals a high prevalence of impaired capacitation in men questioning their fertility.

Authors :
Sharara F
Seaman E
Morris R
Schinfeld J
Nichols J
Sobel M
Lee A
Somkuti S
Hirshberg S
Budinetz T
Barmat L
Palermo G
Rosenwaks Z
Bar-Chama N
Bodie J
Nichols J
Payne J
McCoy T
Tarnawa E
Whitman-Elia G
Weissmann L
Doukakis M
Hurwitz J
Leondires M
Murdock C
Ressler I
Richlin S
Williams S
Wosnitzer M
Butcher M
Kashanian J
Ahlering P
Aubuchon M
Ostermeier GC
Travis AJ
Source :
Reproductive biomedicine online [Reprod Biomed Online] 2020 Jul; Vol. 41 (1), pp. 69-79. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 01.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Research Questions: Can a previously defined relationship between sperm capacitation and the probability of a man generating pregnancy within three cycles, prospectively predict male fertility in diverse clinical settings? A second study asked, what is the prevalence of impaired sperm fertilizing ability in men questioning their fertility (MQF), and does this relate to traditional semen analysis metrics?<br />Design: In the multicentric, prospective observational study, data (n = 128; six clinics) were analysed to test a published relationship between the percentage of fertilization-competent, capacitated spermatozoa (Cap-Score) and probability of generating pregnancy (PGP) within three cycles of intrauterine insemination. Logistic regression of total pregnancy outcomes (n = 252) assessed fit. In the cohort comparison, Cap-Scores of MQF (n = 2155; 22 clinics) were compared with those of 76 fertile men.<br />Results: New outcomes (n = 128) were rank-ordered by Cap-Score and divided into quintiles (25-26 per group); chi-squared testing revealed no difference between predicted and observed pregnancies (P = 0.809). Total outcomes (n = 252; 128 new + 124 previous) were pooled and the model recalculated, yielding an improved fit (P < 0.001). Applying the Akaike information criterion found that the optimal model used Cap-Score alone. Cap-Scores were performed on 2155 men (with semen analysis data available for 1948). To compare fertilizing ability, men were binned by PGP (≤19%, 20-29%, 30-39%, 40-49%, 50-59%, ≥60%). Distributions of PGP and the corresponding Cap-Scores were significantly lower in MQF versus fertile men (P < 0.001). Notably, 64% of MQF with normal volume, concentration and motility (757/1183) had PGP of 39% or less (Cap-Scores ≤31), versus 25% of fertile men.<br />Conclusions: Sperm capacitation prospectively predicted male fertility. Impaired capacitation affects many MQF with normal semen analysis results, informing diagnosis versus idiopathic infertility.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-6491
Volume :
41
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Reproductive biomedicine online
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32505543
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.011