Back to Search Start Over

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019.

Authors :
Giri VN
Knudsen KE
Kelly WK
Cheng HH
Cooney KA
Cookson MS
Dahut W
Weissman S
Soule HR
Petrylak DP
Dicker AP
AlDubayan SH
Toland AE
Pritchard CC
Pettaway CA
Daly MB
Mohler JL
Parsons JK
Carroll PR
Pilarski R
Blanco A
Woodson A
Rahm A
Taplin ME
Polascik TJ
Helfand BT
Hyatt C
Morgans AK
Feng F
Mullane M
Powers J
Concepcion R
Lin DW
Wender R
Mark JR
Costello A
Burnett AL
Sartor O
Isaacs WB
Xu J
Weitzel J
Andriole GL
Beltran H
Briganti A
Byrne L
Calvaresi A
Chandrasekar T
Chen DYT
Den RB
Dobi A
Crawford ED
Eastham J
Eggener S
Freedman ML
Garnick M
Gomella PT
Handley N
Hurwitz MD
Izes J
Karnes RJ
Lallas C
Languino L
Loeb S
Lopez AM
Loughlin KR
Lu-Yao G
Malkowicz SB
Mann M
Mille P
Miner MM
Morgan T
Moreno J
Mucci L
Myers RE
Nielsen SM
O'Neil B
Pinover W
Pinto P
Poage W
Raj GV
Rebbeck TR
Ryan C
Sandler H
Schiewer M
Scott EMD
Szymaniak B
Tester W
Trabulsi EJ
Vapiwala N
Yu EY
Zeigler-Johnson C
Gomella LG
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2020 Aug 20; Vol. 38 (24), pp. 2798-2811. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 09.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Purpose: Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services.<br />Methods: A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider).<br />Results: Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing-initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing-was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM , for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM , and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches.<br />Conclusion: This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
38
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32516092
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00046