Back to Search Start Over

Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients.

Authors :
Willeit P
Tschiderer L
Allara E
Reuber K
Seekircher L
Gao L
Liao X
Lonn E
Gerstein HC
Yusuf S
Brouwers FP
Asselbergs FW
van Gilst W
Anderssen SA
Grobbee DE
Kastelein JJP
Visseren FLJ
Ntaios G
Hatzitolios AI
Savopoulos C
Nieuwkerk PT
Stroes E
Walters M
Higgins P
Dawson J
Gresele P
Guglielmini G
Migliacci R
Ezhov M
Safarova M
Balakhonova T
Sato E
Amaha M
Nakamura T
Kapellas K
Jamieson LM
Skilton M
Blumenthal JA
Hinderliter A
Sherwood A
Smith PJ
van Agtmael MA
Reiss P
van Vonderen MGA
Kiechl S
Klingenschmid G
Sitzer M
Stehouwer CDA
Uthoff H
Zou ZY
Cunha AR
Neves MF
Witham MD
Park HW
Lee MS
Bae JH
Bernal E
Wachtell K
Kjeldsen SE
Olsen MH
Preiss D
Sattar N
Beishuizen E
Huisman MV
Espeland MA
Schmidt C
Agewall S
Ok E
Aşçi G
de Groot E
Grooteman MPC
Blankestijn PJ
Bots ML
Sweeting MJ
Thompson SG
Lorenz MW
Source :
Circulation [Circulation] 2020 Aug 18; Vol. 142 (7), pp. 621-642. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 17.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: To quantify the association between effects of interventions on carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) progression and their effects on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.<br />Methods: We systematically collated data from randomized, controlled trials. cIMT was assessed as the mean value at the common-carotid-artery; if unavailable, the maximum value at the common-carotid-artery or other cIMT measures were used. The primary outcome was a combined CVD end point defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedures, or fatal CVD. We estimated intervention effects on cIMT progression and incident CVD for each trial, before relating the 2 using a Bayesian meta-regression approach.<br />Results: We analyzed data of 119 randomized, controlled trials involving 100 667 patients (mean age 62 years, 42% female). Over an average follow-up of 3.7 years, 12 038 patients developed the combined CVD end point. Across all interventions, each 10 μm/y reduction of cIMT progression resulted in a relative risk for CVD of 0.91 (95% Credible Interval, 0.87-0.94), with an additional relative risk for CVD of 0.92 (0.87-0.97) being achieved independent of cIMT progression. Taken together, we estimated that interventions reducing cIMT progression by 10, 20, 30, or 40 μm/y would yield relative risks of 0.84 (0.75-0.93), 0.76 (0.67-0.85), 0.69 (0.59-0.79), or 0.63 (0.52-0.74), respectively. Results were similar when grouping trials by type of intervention, time of conduct, time to ultrasound follow-up, availability of individual-participant data, primary versus secondary prevention trials, type of cIMT measurement, and proportion of female patients.<br />Conclusions: The extent of intervention effects on cIMT progression predicted the degree of CVD risk reduction. This provides a missing link supporting the usefulness of cIMT progression as a surrogate marker for CVD risk in clinical trials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4539
Volume :
142
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32546049
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046361