Back to Search
Start Over
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology [J Clin Virol] 2020 Aug; Vol. 129, pp. 104511. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 15. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 has promoted the development of new serological tests that could be complementary to RT-PCR. Nevertheless, the assessment of clinical performances of available tests is urgently required as their use has just been initiated for diagnose.<br />Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of three immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.<br />Methods: Two automated immunoassays (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 CLIA IgG and Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG/IgA assays) and one lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA NG-Test® IgG-IgM COVID-19) were tested. 293 specimens were analyzed from patients with a positive RT-PCR response, from patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 but exhibiting a negative response to the RT-PCR detection test, and from control group specimens. Days since symptoms onset were collected from clinical information sheet associated with respiratory tract samples.<br />Results: Overall sensitivity for IgG was equivalent (around 80 %) for CLIA, ELISA and LFIA. Sensitivity for IgG detection, >14 days after onset of symptoms, was 100.0 % for all assays. Overall specificity for IgG was greater for CLIA and LFIA (more than 98 %) compared to ELISA (95.8 %). Specificity was significantly different between IgA ELISA (78.9 %) and IgM LFIA (95.8 %) (p < 0.05). The best agreement was observed between CLIA and LFIA assays (97 %; k = 0.936).<br />Conclusion: Excellent sensitivity for IgG detection was obtained >14 days after onset of symptoms for all immunoassays. Specificity was also excellent for IgG CLIA and IgG LFIA. Our study shows that NG-Test® is reliable and accurate for routine use in clinical laboratories.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Automation, Laboratory methods
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin A blood
Immunoglobulin G blood
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
Antibodies, Viral blood
Betacoronavirus immunology
Clinical Laboratory Techniques methods
Coronavirus Infections diagnosis
Immunoassay methods
Pneumonia, Viral diagnosis
Serologic Tests methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-5967
- Volume :
- 129
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32593133
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511