Back to Search Start Over

Effect of wheat species (Triticum aestivum vs T. spelta), farming system (organic vs conventional) and flour type (wholegrain vs white) on composition of wheat flour - Results of a retail survey in the UK and Germany - 3. Pesticide residue content.

Authors :
Wang J
Hasanalieva G
Wood L
Anagnostopoulos C
Ampadogiannis G
Bempelou E
Kiousi M
Markellou E
Iversen PO
Seal C
Baranski M
Vigar V
Leifert C
Rempelos L
Source :
Food chemistry: X [Food Chem X] 2020 Mar 29; Vol. 7, pp. 100089. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 29 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Wheat is a major component of the Northern European diet and contributes significantly to dietary pesticide exposure. Here we report results of a 2-year retail survey, which compared pesticide residues in organic and conventional, whole-grain and white, common and Spelt wheat flour brands available in the UK and Germany. Pesticide residues were detected significantly more frequently in conventional (87%) than organic (25%) flour samples. Chlormequat, a plant growth regulator, was the most frequently detected compound. Total concentrations of pesticide residues were (a) ~4 times higher in conventional than organic, (b) ~100% higher in common than Spelt wheat flour and (c) ~110% higher in conventional whole-grain than white flour samples, but (d) not significantly different in organic whole-grain and white flour. Results suggest that the use of organic wheat products allows increased whole-grain cereal consumption in line with nutritional recommendations, without an increase in dietary pesticide intake.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (© 2020 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2590-1575
Volume :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Food chemistry: X
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32637911
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2020.100089